Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 3:41 am
Heh he was just alluding to that methinks.
Your #1 NHL EHM resource site!
https://www.ehmtheblueline.com/forums/
Bingo.Danny wrote:Heh he was just alluding to that methinks.
Batdad... saying... fun?batdad wrote:Me want to mock another mock draft! Yes ! So fun. So fun.
Alex is back. Alex sticks head out of his little hole. Batdad aims ...... fires.... scores 1000 points.alexob18 wrote:Batdad... saying... fun?batdad wrote:Me want to mock another mock draft! Yes ! So fun. So fun.
Does not compute![]()
Though I'd be down. Shot the Avs if it happens!
alexob18 wrote:Danny wrote: Taking Hamill high in the first in 07 didn't exactly work out for the Bs.![]()
Hamill is still developing and looks like he'll be a decent 2nd line player in his time. I actually really like Hamill. He was regarded as one of the top prospects in his draft and by far one of the safest players to take. He's developing quite nicely.
philou21 wrote:Honestly, I don't follow that much the prospect until I watch the draft.But Pulkkinen seems really promising from what I've heard of a couple of fellows here.
Did McIlrath was the guy Danny talked about in another thread? Like the Bruins have spot him? I really don't know him but it seems to be really too earlier to be pick up in the first round.
I'm more curious to see if after the decent draft they got last year if the Habs will destroy this one.
Anything Kabanov says needs to be taken with a whole salt shaker, if his dad is the puppet master, you can't really trust what he says.bruins72 wrote:I'm hearing a lot of talk about the B's loving Watson. He seems like a good B's type of player. I'd love to see the Bruins go after McIlrath but I don't want them to take him with the 15th overall. If he's still there in the 20's, I wouldn't mind seeing them make a deal to use the 32nd overall plus something to move up and grab him.Danny wrote:Yes it was him. I don't know if the Bruins are seriously considering him. Seems he's got a mediocre skill-set but is one mean customer. Sometimes it's better to take a gamble on the guy who's at least outstanding in one aspect of the game in his draft class ( in this case physical play) rather than to go for the alleged safe pick. Taking Hamill high in the first in 07 didn't exactly work out for the Bs.
I hope Skinner falls to 15, unless of course the Bruins trade up to grab one of the Dmen supposed to go earlier. I guess Austin would be fine as well.
As for Kabanov... he seemed to be trying to do the right thing for a bit. He admitted he made a mistake by leaving his Junior team and stated that he wouldn't be going back to Russia to play. He said he wanted to play in North America, whether that be in Junior, AHL, or NHL. Then about a week or two later, his agent (who is supposed to be one of the better agents out there) dropped. From what I've been reading, his father is a control freak and is really helping ruin the kid's career. He's going to be a risky pick.
I actually know nothing of stoned and playing video games. But if I am drunk and get my hands on a controller, I'm like that episode of Family Guy where Peter is a drunken piano virtuoso.philou21 wrote:Don't generalize too much Hucth please. At least if everyone was playing video games it could make less problems IMO.
The Hutch wrote:I actually know nothing of stoned and playing video games. But if I am drunk and get my hands on a controller, I'm like that episode of Family Guy where Peter is a drunken piano virtuoso.philou21 wrote:Don't generalize too much Hucth please. At least if everyone was playing video games it could make less problems IMO.
One year later.....Hey, since when that guy's in my team?? Jokinen on the block!alexob18 wrote:I know! Let's trade our 1st next year for Jokinen!