Page 27 of 84
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:29 pm
by batdad
Heh. Well said B72. Save for one thing, that is 1/6 out of the top 6 for Les Habicraps. And in Boston how much of the top 6 are you missing...2/3?
So in Math terms Montreal is better off than Boston. Thus in the next meeting of the two teams: Boston 21 Montreal 0. Hmm...I guess nothing did change.
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:35 pm
by bruins72
Okay, now I'm confused.
All I know is that Lucic is looking like he'll be back in the lineup on Thursday and Savard is skating again, so he looks to be back soon as well. Oh and the Habs are still smurfs.

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:05 pm
by alexob18
Haha well they have one really tall guy. What's his name again? Umm. He's like invisible on the ice so I forget his name... Hal something or other...

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:11 pm
by Franck
They have quite a few guys who are well over 6 ft actually.

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:13 pm
by alexob18
Ha it was more of a shot at Hal Gill being so big and useless but yeah, they actually do have some bigger guys. Just the best players on that team are smurfs

Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:58 am
by Danny
Dupont from the Boston Globe says Savard is looking for 32m / 7 years.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:26 am
by alexob18
I'd jump on that in a second. One of the best playmakers for under 5 mill?
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:53 am
by mustardstew
wonder how the front-loading goes on that contract - hate to pay 3-4 million at age 38-39... unless someone with an accurate crystal ball says he gets 70 pts. then as well...
but yes, I think I jump on that too - not only a super-talented playmaker, but has more heart and passion than many of the current playing Bruins
Disclaimer: I am biased - Savard is my favorite Bruin
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:40 pm
by alexob18
I'm sure it would be front loaded. The B's aren' that stupid to pay an aging center 3.5 or 4 mill.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:39 pm
by bruins72
I've been hearing that the deal will be front-loaded so that most of the money will be paid out in the first 3-4 years of the deal. That would mean that if they wanted to buy him out when he's getting older, they shouldn't be on the hook for too much.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:38 pm
by Jypfan92
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:48 pm
by batdad
Not much to choose from over time.
Snepsts, Kearns, Halward,Kevin McArthy, Ohlund. That is about it. May be one or two others, but that is really slim pickins. About 2 years ago they did an all time team...maybe 5 years now. Dennis Kearns was on that team. Scary stuff.
Yes I know Paul Reinhart played in Vancouver...but not enough to warrant any kind of consideration. Jeff Brown was an idiot so cannot put his name in.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:04 pm
by Jypfan92
And few years ago Ed Jovanovski played his best games in Canucks (i think) and Sami Salo has been many years their top2 defenseman.
And about Jyrki Lumme: Who remembers (or who have heard) canadian rockbands Glenn Ford & The Piers's song called "What's Wrong With Lumme"? I don't have but i'm interested to listen that. They made that song when Lumme played in Maple Leafs, and i'm not sure, but i've heard that song isn't praising him

. But last years in Nhl Lumme played "invisible game", and maybe that's why they make mock song about him (i'm not sure that is it mock song, but i've heard).
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:30 pm
by philou21
I should have post this earlier but i forget to do it.
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=298813
Good move from Fleury!!

Make this idiot pay for what he's done.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:22 pm
by alexob18
So the Canes suck... Just listened to a Bob Mackenzie podcast with him confirming that they indeed do suck. Thanks Bob...
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:06 am
by bruins72
I can't believe the Bruins blew it in the final minute... again. They won the shootout but I hate shootouts. Plus, it never should have gotten to that point. They had the game won and you can let a team score on you with 40-something seconds left.
](./images/smilies/wallbash.gif)
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:07 am
by philou21
bruins72 wrote:I can't believe the Bruins blew it in the final minute... again. They won the shootout but I hate shootouts. Plus, it never should have gotten to that point. They had the game won and you can let a team score on you with 40-something seconds left.
](./images/smilies/wallbash.gif)
I'll take that point.

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:55 am
by Danny
Easy Ryder heh, nhl.com is so creative

Why does Wideman keep tripping over his own feet ? Jeez
You've got to feel sorry for the Leafs...HAHAHA
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 4:00 am
by alexob18
I feel bad for them alright. They're playing like rubbish.
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 4:11 am
by Danny
It's not even the fact that they lost but how they lost. Blowing a 3 goal lead, Canes tying it at 4 on the PP after one Canes player was high-sticked by his teammate but the refs accidentally called White for it, scoring the go ahead goal with 30s left and giving up the tying goal with less than 2 seconds to go, then losing the SO. Rubbish but hilarious

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 4:35 am
by alexob18
Sad as hell is what it is.
I wanted to cry.
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:00 am
by Jypfan92
Tuomo Ruutu played well last night, scoring 0+4 and then scored game-winning-goal in shoot-out. His +/- rating was +3.

It was nice to see that Canes won

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:57 pm
by alexob18
It was nice to see them win, but so painful to watch the Laffs just die.
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:14 pm
by Manimal
Seen Stamkos?
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 4:17 pm
by philou21
Danny wrote:It's not even the fact that they lost but how they lost. Blowing a 3 goal lead, Canes tying it at 4 on the PP after one Canes player was high-sticked by his teammate but the refs accidentally called White for it, scoring the go ahead goal with 30s left and giving up the tying goal with less than 2 seconds to go, then losing the SO. Rubbish but hilarious

That was really awful. I was watching TV and sometimes i go check the game and it was like 2-0 then it was something like 4-3 and then 5-5 and the shutout loss.
