EHM The Blue Line

Well, Cooke played really good for my Oilers, but look at the second pic and you'll understand why I let him go...

Sniff! 4mill. 4 points in 15 games lidström regen and he get's upset when i give him offical warning. Diva alert! i smell a trade.

At least Berglind makes less money than the money crazy Cooke does in my game!

Giving a warning just because a player don't make enough point will always make's him angry. Your Lidstrom regen got good performances despite the number of points, so it's normal that he is frustrated. If maybe he was doing an average of 6.20, with some 5-5-6-9-6-5 performances, now it's the right moment to give a warning.

last 15 games is under 7 average and that isn't enough for my top d-man but he broke his hip and is away for 2 months so my youngsters get a shot

Thats was fast.

Career shift by the players!

0gris wrote:

Thats was fast.

That happened often to me with, Heatley-Tavares-Michael Lidström (some swede regen).

HTML-line, too bad I had that save times before I joined this forum. Would've been cool to post it here.

Ah, it's good to be back...

Footnote75 wrote:Ah, it's good to be back...

This one is funny!

Alex the Tall wrote:

Footnote75 wrote:Ah, it's good to be back...

This one is funny!

Oddly fitting too

Weirdest thing I've ever seen in a draft:

I quickly checked out the prelim rankings for the 2014 draft class and noticed this player. What the Dickens?

A polish ice hockey phenom with the craziest stats for a 17/18 year old I've ever seen, with horrible consistency. I swear I didn't create this guy, EHM continues to surprise me...

What database are you using? I think Lidas put in a couple of talented prospects into the 2.2 version, just to make this kind of thing possible. It sure is nice to see a Polish regen of that ability.

The first name is spelled wrong, though... should be Szczepan. It's not the most popular name around here.

Círyatan wrote:What database are you using? I think Lidas put in a couple of talented prospects into the 2.2 version, just to make this kind of thing possible. It sure is nice to see a Polish regen of that ability.

The first name is spelled wrong, though... should be Szczepan. It's not the most popular name around here.

What makes you say he's a regen, he's not.

Círyatan wrote:What database are you using? I think Lidas put in a couple of talented prospects into the 2.2 version, just to make this kind of thing possible. It sure is nice to see a Polish regen of that ability.

The first name is spelled wrong, though... should be Szczepan. It's not the most popular name around here.

Lidas DB 2.1

I think it's so cool that there are random nationality super players possibly floating around. I wish he had a better consistency though

jtilson23 wrote:Weirdest thing I've ever seen in a draft:

I quickly checked out the prelim rankings for the 2014 draft class and noticed this player. What the Dickens?

A polish ice hockey phenom with the craziest stats for a 17/18 year old I've ever seen, with horrible consistency. I swear I didn't create this guy, EHM continues to surprise me...

I think he's the Marius Czerkawskis regen. He use to come up in the 2009 or 2010 draft in the Lidas 1.X rosters, but I guess he doesn't retire that early in the 2.x rosters.

eternium85 wrote:

jtilson23 wrote:Weirdest thing I've ever seen in a draft:

I quickly checked out the prelim rankings for the 2014 draft class and noticed this player. What the Dickens?

A polish ice hockey phenom with the craziest stats for a 17/18 year old I've ever seen, with horrible consistency. I swear I didn't create this guy, EHM continues to surprise me...

I think he's the Marius Czerkawskis regen. He use to come up in the 2009 or 2010 draft in the Lidas 1.X rosters, but I guess he doesn't retire that early in the 2.x rosters.

He's not Czerkawski's, Czerkawski was 6'0, this guy is 6'2.

Was he that good though? Those are superstar technical stats.

IceTimer wrote:

eternium85 wrote:

jtilson23 wrote:Weirdest thing I've ever seen in a draft:

I quickly checked out the prelim rankings for the 2014 draft class and noticed this player. What the Dickens?

A polish ice hockey phenom with the craziest stats for a 17/18 year old I've ever seen, with horrible consistency. I swear I didn't create this guy, EHM continues to surprise me...

I think he's the Marius Czerkawskis regen. He use to come up in the 2009 or 2010 draft in the Lidas 1.X rosters, but I guess he doesn't retire that early in the 2.x rosters.

He's not Czerkawski's, Czerkawski was 6'0, this guy is 6'2.

As I've said before, regens height and weight can vary. But of course he could be randomly created player. But he's attributes look very similar with Czerkawski and the low consistency too.

jtilson23 wrote:Was he that good though? Those are superstar technical stats.

Well when the game starts Czerkawski is finishing up his career in europe somewhere I believe, next time I play I'll look him up, but I don't expect his stats to be that good if he's there.

I should say that I really doubt that it's Czer's regen because of the height difference, because I've never heard of a regen not being the same height, if this is the case here, then this is a 1st, or someone got Czer's height wrong.

IceTimer wrote:

jtilson23 wrote:Was he that good though? Those are superstar technical stats.

Well when the game starts Czerkawski is finishing up his career in europe somewhere I believe, next time I play I'll look him up, but I don't expect his stats to be that good if he's there.

I should say that I really doubt that it's Czer's regen because of the height difference, because I've never heard of a regen not being the same height, if this is the case here, then this is a 1st, or someone got Czer's height wrong.

I've had tons of regens that height or weight isn't same as the original players.
Here Czerkawskis regen from one of my saves:
Czerkawski
Czerkawski2

This is from Lidas 1.3 rosters. I haven't played that far with the 2.x rosters that I could find him there. But it looks like Czerkawskis height is really wrong in the database 'cause this guy too is 6'2.

EDIT: Now both pics should work.

Ok, so I just checked and it is Czerkawski's regen, honest mistake though because his height is 6'2 in the game for some reason, when it should be 6'0.

Extra little tidbit, in the original faked DB Czerkawski has a different name.

eternium85 wrote:

IceTimer wrote:

jtilson23 wrote:Was he that good though? Those are superstar technical stats.

Well when the game starts Czerkawski is finishing up his career in europe somewhere I believe, next time I play I'll look him up, but I don't expect his stats to be that good if he's there.

I should say that I really doubt that it's Czer's regen because of the height difference, because I've never heard of a regen not being the same height, if this is the case here, then this is a 1st, or someone got Czer's height wrong.

I've had tons of regens that height or weight isn't same as the original players.
Here Czerkawskis regen from one of my saves:
Czerkawski
Czerkawski2

This is from Lidas 1.3 rosters. I haven't played that far with the 2.x rosters that I could find him there. But it looks like Czerkawskis height is really wrong in the database 'cause this guy too is 6'2.

Only the 2nd pic works.

This is what I gathered from his real life hockey stats:

Elitserien totals:
124 GP - 36 G - 35 A - 71 PTS

NHL totals:
745 GP - 215 G - 220 A - 435 PTS

Good stats, but not quite deserved of his superstar technicals shown in the regen @ age 17 (or any age). I'd expect 15s and 16s at the highest, with a bit better consistency.

jtilson23 wrote:This is what I gathered from his real life hockey stats:

Elitserien totals:
124 GP - 36 G - 35 A - 71 PTS

NHL totals:
745 GP - 215 G - 220 A - 435 PTS

Good stats, but not quite deserved of his superstar technicals shown in the regen @ age 17 (or any age). I'd expect 15s and 16s at the highest, with a bit better consistency.

He had pretty good technicals at age 34/35 too.


It's going to be interesting and a bit funny if he goes #1 or even top 3 in your draft, he could bust hard.