Choosing league-settings at the start
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 12:05 pm
I haven't found anything regarding this topic while looking through the last pages, so I thought I'd ask in a new topic:
I haven't played the game in quite some time, and now wanted to get back into it with the new rosters. Since the last time I played quite a few leagues have been added though, especially in the US and lower levels in Europe, and now I wanted to ask what kind of difference it makes in terms of development between having the leagues running on full-sim, view-only or not active at all.
I generally want to have all big and decent nations have a proper level of talent and normal development, but at the same time I don't want things to be too taxing on the performance. I don't plan on playing in most of the leagues anyway, so is putting (for example) all the Swedish leagues on view-only enough, would it be beneficial to have the first-tier on full-sim even if I don't plan on playing there, or is it even necessary for proper development to have lower leagues active at all?
The same question applies to US college and youth leagues as well as Canadian juniors.
I think last time around I had the NHL, AHL, ECHL, the three major junior leagues and the biggest European leagues running full, a lot of leagues on view-only and some not active at all. Now I would like to know if some of this is even necessary, and how others are handling all the different leagues?
I haven't played the game in quite some time, and now wanted to get back into it with the new rosters. Since the last time I played quite a few leagues have been added though, especially in the US and lower levels in Europe, and now I wanted to ask what kind of difference it makes in terms of development between having the leagues running on full-sim, view-only or not active at all.
I generally want to have all big and decent nations have a proper level of talent and normal development, but at the same time I don't want things to be too taxing on the performance. I don't plan on playing in most of the leagues anyway, so is putting (for example) all the Swedish leagues on view-only enough, would it be beneficial to have the first-tier on full-sim even if I don't plan on playing there, or is it even necessary for proper development to have lower leagues active at all?
The same question applies to US college and youth leagues as well as Canadian juniors.
I think last time around I had the NHL, AHL, ECHL, the three major junior leagues and the biggest European leagues running full, a lot of leagues on view-only and some not active at all. Now I would like to know if some of this is even necessary, and how others are handling all the different leagues?