Forward vs Defense Discussion
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:44 pm
What separation is made between forwards and defensemen? I guess what I'm asking is what causes a player to be labeled as such early on. Is it stick ability? Speed? Offensive/defensive skills?
I guess I see hockey as like basketball except that players are more "pigeon holed" into positions. In basketball, your height somewhat determines what position you play (you don't see many PGs over 6-5 for a reason or C's below 6-9). What factors are used in hockey to determine that player A should be a forward and player B should be a defenseman?
I'm also wondering what would happen if a team started using more hybrid type players. Instead of 3/2 split, what if you ran out 3 guys who can score and two who are strong on D? I know the Canes used a 5 F PP for the last few years. I'm wondering why teams don't attempt this.
From an EHM perspective, it's something I'm thinking about doing with my AHL team. Obviously, you'll need to balance the lines out in terms of scoring/defense/etc. With a good number of two-way forwards, I'm sure a team could do well running out lines of 5 balanced players who are threats. It would be interesting to see how typical lockdown forwards fare as defensemen and offensemen as wingers.
Just thinking out loud. If this needs to be moved to another area or merged with another thread, please accept my apologies. I wasn't sure exactly where this should fit in.
MOD NOTE: Renamed subject. "A Stupid Question" isn't a very descriptive subject line. In the future, please give a subject line that actually describes what you're talking about. - B72
I guess I see hockey as like basketball except that players are more "pigeon holed" into positions. In basketball, your height somewhat determines what position you play (you don't see many PGs over 6-5 for a reason or C's below 6-9). What factors are used in hockey to determine that player A should be a forward and player B should be a defenseman?
I'm also wondering what would happen if a team started using more hybrid type players. Instead of 3/2 split, what if you ran out 3 guys who can score and two who are strong on D? I know the Canes used a 5 F PP for the last few years. I'm wondering why teams don't attempt this.
From an EHM perspective, it's something I'm thinking about doing with my AHL team. Obviously, you'll need to balance the lines out in terms of scoring/defense/etc. With a good number of two-way forwards, I'm sure a team could do well running out lines of 5 balanced players who are threats. It would be interesting to see how typical lockdown forwards fare as defensemen and offensemen as wingers.
Just thinking out loud. If this needs to be moved to another area or merged with another thread, please accept my apologies. I wasn't sure exactly where this should fit in.
MOD NOTE: Renamed subject. "A Stupid Question" isn't a very descriptive subject line. In the future, please give a subject line that actually describes what you're talking about. - B72