Unambitious NHL teams?
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 2:21 pm
Anyone got any? I feel like playing but I dont want too much to be hanging on my results. Ive tried Washington and dont fancy the Pens.
EHM The Blue Line
Your #1 NHL EHM resource site!
https://www.ehmtheblueline.com/forums/
Unambitious NHL teams?
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 3:53 pm
How about the Columbus Blue Jackets? They have some good prospects in Nash, Zherdev, Picard, and Brule.
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 6:49 pm
Check the current standings of the NHL and pick any of the teams at the bottom of the heap 
When you first start up the Board will tell you what they expect; you're looking for them to say they just want you to improve the roster. If the team you pick doesn't say that add a GM and pick a new club
When you first start up the Board will tell you what they expect; you're looking for them to say they just want you to improve the roster. If the team you pick doesn't say that add a GM and pick a new club
Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 9:37 pm
Personally I have found Buffalo to be very forgiving (like finishing bottom-5 my first 3 years)
Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 9:41 pm
Try St. Louis.
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 1:31 am
As much as you might not want to, the pens are probably the most unambitious team. After I won the stanley cup, the next year they told me to improve my roster(again)... 
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 9:54 am
Florida start low with expectations only to improve, and a number of good young players.
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 8:48 pm
Chicago. That is all.
Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 8:07 am
Actually, with their budget Chicago expect you to reach the playoffs IIRC, and with that team it's hard.
Chicago are one of the better long term teams in the game as their prospects are good, and worth a fortune in trades.
Chicago are one of the better long term teams in the game as their prospects are good, and worth a fortune in trades.