I was talking general history. In Canada, the Red Wings have always had the media behind them. The Red Wing model, the great coaching, scouting and drafting. The classy way to play the game, the outstanding development system. The media (which were actually correct for the most part) really harped on this especially in regards to how bad the Leaf organization is. Every team that drafted a guy late got compared to the Red Wings....
It is something that is interesting to me that this season the Red Wings have not been a story, other than will Babcock resign there or leave?
I get that in this case the media is doing exactly what you said, it is just interesting to me that for the first time in what two decades? ... Detroit is not being seen as the greatest thing since sliced bread....and in fact have been a complete non-story.
I also get it is not a conspiracy...in fact nothing ever is. It is just the way the media are handling it that is very different from how this would have been dealt with in the past. The wings would have had the credit...not to say the Kronwall thing would not have been harped on, it would have...as he has been in general the exception to the media reporting all things great out of Detroit. Two, maybe even one year ago Tampa would be the heel and Detroit would be the good guy. That has switched this season. It is just an interesting point.
Buffy was not swept under the rug up here, he was definitely painted as the heel. In Van-Cal....Ferland was the great emerging superstar as you say...the next Cam Neely. Whereas the Canucks were painted as chicken and old. Sam Bennett was great in the series, yet so too was Bo Horvat. Bennett was painted as the next coming of Messier, and HOrvat? Well he was nothing.
Now that being said..the reports on Calgary = Vancouver were fairly accurate. Calgary worked their butts off and Vancouver looked old and slow with the exception of Horvat. Even Hansen went missing with his speed (Turns out playing with a groin injury). Vrbata was chicken out there. Ferland WAS A WRECKING ball.
The bias of the media is just interesting to me, as it seems much more dominant than it has been in the past. Craig SImpson vs Harry Neale. Jim Hughson vs Bob Cole.
at the same time it is hilarious to me that CAlgary fans thought Hughie and Simmer were biased to Vancouver in the series. Which was not the case at all.
Losing Zidlicky should help your team.

I kid I kid
Anyone vs Detroit in media in the past, Detroit was always the good guy, save for the media of the other team they were playing. The change to heel (not really heel but not the story) is interesting. Kronwall always would get reported and harped on, but in the past the Palat hit would definitely have been the bigger story. Just pointing out the reversal of hockey media and move away from how awesome the Wings org is to...the other side in so many ways. Not saying out to get Detroit, just saying...interesting and kind of a breath of fresh air.