The games I played but failed to save:
3rd place
About +20
PP 10%
PK 91%
Now by repeating basically exactly the same things when re-playing them:
10th place
-5
PP 2.7%
PK 83.1%
This is complete and utter bull and why I get - - - - - with the game.
](./images/smilies/wallbash.gif)

Moderator: Challenge Moderators
Yeah, but no one else did the exact same things, and everything that can be variable for your team is also potentially different in a different sim.....I think this is considered a positive of the game (replayability), not a negativevisualdarkness wrote:Now by repeating basically exactly the same things when re-playing them
Boyko is a nice fill-in for a top two injury but I would never have him as a regular there. He is a good third line C though.bruins72 wrote:Nice job, vis!
I have been struggling far more than I thought I would in this second season. I wasn't the worst team in the first set of 20 games. I'm close to wrapping up the second set of 20 games for the season and I think I might be the worst again. I just don't know what I'm doing wrong that I can't get these guys to click. I know I definitely misjudged my choices when trading for defensmen to start the challenge. I think I may have judged them thinking they'd turn out like they did in the last challenge. Whether it's changes in the new version of the DB or if it's just the randomness, these guys just didn't turn out as good as I expected. They're all 5-6 defensemen and not any real top pairing guys. I need to be able to trade most of them or replace them from within. I also need a better #2 center. Grigorenko or Boyko just isn't cutting it.
Dont get me started on goalies. One or two two star goalies are usually the best goalies in the draft, followed by about five one star ones. Atts like recovery above red values are rare.CeeBee wrote:In 07 the drafts may have been too good but in EA they are downright horrible. I understand that the first few depend on the DB but even after 5 or 6 years there are usually few players better than 3rd line. Even with the best scouts 5 star players are few and far between. Takes a lot of the fun out of drafting and team building that way.
Olle Eriksson-Ek is turning into a beast in my save. 2017 draft I believe. Close to 93% in AHL the first year as a 18 year-old, now I am thinking about using him as one of the two in NHL as a 19 year-old.visualdarkness wrote:Dont get me started on goalies. One or two two star goalies are usually the best goalies in the draft, followed by about five one star ones. Atts like recovery above red values are rare.CeeBee wrote:In 07 the drafts may have been too good but in EA they are downright horrible. I understand that the first few depend on the DB but even after 5 or 6 years there are usually few players better than 3rd line. Even with the best scouts 5 star players are few and far between. Takes a lot of the fun out of drafting and team building that way.
That is the draft before the abyss, just wait...Sesyde wrote:Olle Eriksson-Ek is turning into a beast in my save. 2017 draft I believe. Close to 93% in AHL the first year as a 18 year-old, now I am thinking about using him as one of the two in NHL as a 19 year-old.
Wow, that forward squad looks rough. It is basically my line up but without the first line.Asher413 wrote:Hertl-Johansen-Nieto
Goldobin-Girgensons-Hartman
O'Regan-Veleno-Barabanov
Carlsson-Zubarev-Sorensen
You are simply too dominant at the game, just suck a bit more like the rest of us.radiskull wrote:I overcame my boredom and finally finished 4th season. Even more domination. Definitely my last season in this challenge and probably this game for a long time.
Mascherin was injured for 45 games, that's disappointment. But Wingels decided to take his place and scored 110 points. That's the best result for my player in all 4 seasons. I don't know why Wingels is such a beast.
We grabbed almost all of the awards for the season. 4 players in first All-star team and that's only because Mascherin was injured.
Well, this game became pretty boring really fast.
Your dominance brings back memories from ehm 05.. I was going to ask you for advice but then I realised, the longer the game remains challenging the better. It takes the fun out of it, at least for me, once you are able to breeze your way thourgh a season in such manner.radiskull wrote:I overcame my boredom and finally finished 4th season. Even more domination. Definitely my last season in this challenge and probably this game for a long time.
Mascherin was injured for 45 games, that's disappointment. But Wingels decided to take his place and scored 110 points. That's the best result for my player in all 4 seasons. I don't know why Wingels is such a beast.
We grabbed almost all of the awards for the season. 4 players in first All-star team and that's only because Mascherin was injured.
Well, this game became pretty boring really fast.
Would you consider that optimal strategy in this game even remotely realistic, or would you consider it a game solution not really usable in real life hockey? I know there are some buggy things like all-intense practice etc. but strategies etc?radiskull wrote:Yes, it definitely takes fun out of it, but I always found more fun for myself in the process of determining optimal strategies in games. And in other parts of life.) So I had many interesting hours in the game searching for the ways to win. But after I found it, my brain says "Ok, good job, our work here is done, let's go find another problem to solve".