nino33 wrote:FYI - the EHM Updater also edits saved games, and Archi has included the functionality to edit/correct the "randomizing birthday issue" (i.e. make one csv file that you'd apply right after start-up to correct the birth month/day)
I'll have to check that out when I have more time on my hands. It's hard to understand how the EHM updater really works when I haven't check it out that much.
Animal31 wrote:Drouin was drafted in the 2nd round, and has horrible technicals...and is playing in the OHL
(He was born in Sainte-Agathe-des-Monts, Quebec, but grew up in Huberdeau, Quebec.) but you have him set in Mississauga
MacKinnon was drafted in the 3rd round, and never played a game in the Q, in fact he wasnt even drafted, he went to college
Landeskog was never drafted, but was signed at 17 by the blackhawks, 2 year deal on 6/7/11
Murray and Yaukupov went 9/10 in the 2011 draft
Drouin's team is an easy fix.

Landeskog didn't even have a random PA, if I remember correctly he had a pretty good PA... that's weird.
Wonder what happend to McKinnon?
Primis wrote:Can I just say I'm not a fan of the randomized PA's. Never have been. I usually go in myself and edit the top prospects to have set PA's instead. I don't do it with *all* of them (some players like say a Tomas Jurco for instance still probably should be random), but yeah... it bugs me when the negative PA's result in super-wonky drafts and development. I understand the desire for variety and all, but...
I'm not a big fan either. I use them mostly for future prospects. I usually don't use random PA for those who already play in the NHL like Landeskog etc. Anyway, it would be better if the randomizing factor would be narrower, like 180-200 , 170-190, 160-180 etc.
______________________________________________-
Looking at those drafts. I see that guys I've made have a very high reputation and the new guys EHM creates usually has ok & good rep only?! And when I made those youngsters they all have 10-30 rep only!?