Ah, OK...sorry I didn't get it!philou21 wrote:I was sarcastic since the Avs won their first game in 10 and at home on top of that. Their record at home is atrocious this season.

Ah, OK...sorry I didn't get it!philou21 wrote:I was sarcastic since the Avs won their first game in 10 and at home on top of that. Their record at home is atrocious this season.
Didn't seem like charging to me (it's like they're trying to take hitting out of the game); Zadorov had another good hit on Scheifele in that gameClassicSwarley wrote:That hit looked clean to me. Hard and pretty devastating, but clean. Don't really understand how he got a charging penalty for that tbh
Yeah. What details do you need?philou21 wrote:I've just read, without details, that Julien has been fired by Boston.
So true. Their defence is really weak. Rask and the first two lines are good though.philou21 wrote:It's not like the Bruins have the team to perform.
They shouldn't have done some moves they did in the past.* There, I corrected your last sentence.bruins72 wrote:Julien's firing was overdue but the timing was wrong. I would have done it back last summer, or waited until next summer. The team definitely wasn't listening to him anymore. The problem is, they need to make a lot of other moves to right the ship.
The problem there is that... if firing the coach can't help because the GM needs to do roster moves like waivers, trades, signings, etc.... then why fire the coach? The coach doesn't build the team, that's on the GM. Why does the coach get fired first? Why not fire the GM and see what the coach can then do with a better roster? Because if the GM didn't get the right roster now, what indication is there he can do it later after firing a coach?bruins72 wrote:Julien's firing was overdue but the timing was wrong. I would have done it back last summer, or waited until next summer. The team definitely wasn't listening to him anymore. The problem is, they need to make a lot of other moves to right the ship.
There's definitely that! But to correct things, they need to make some moves.philou21 wrote:They shouldn't have done some moves they did in the past.* There, I corrected your last sentence.bruins72 wrote:Julien's firing was overdue but the timing was wrong. I would have done it back last summer, or waited until next summer. The team definitely wasn't listening to him anymore. The problem is, they need to make a lot of other moves to right the ship.
Sweeney is very much a big part of the problem. He wasn't ready to be GM. On top of that, Chiarelli left him a big mess in regards to contracts. There's a lot that needs to be done. I think firing Julien would've been a step in the right direction, not a solution by any means, if it was done in the off-season. I think a lot of people forget that back in 2011 when the Bruins won the Cup, Julien was on the verge of being fired. They were almost knocked out of the playoffs early on and in an embarrassing fashion. On top of that, the Bruins' power play was so bad that it was more of a disadvantage to them to get one.Primis wrote:The problem there is that... if firing the coach can't help because the GM needs to do roster moves like waivers, trades, signings, etc.... then why fire the coach? The coach doesn't build the team, that's on the GM. Why does the coach get fired first? Why not fire the GM and see what the coach can then do with a better roster? Because if the GM didn't get the right roster now, what indication is there he can do it later after firing a coach?bruins72 wrote:Julien's firing was overdue but the timing was wrong. I would have done it back last summer, or waited until next summer. The team definitely wasn't listening to him anymore. The problem is, they need to make a lot of other moves to right the ship.
This is one of the chief debates right now in DET too: people want Blashill fired, but then in the very same breath say the roster isn't good enough. That's on Ken Holland, not Blashill. There's very little indication at all that if Mike Babcock were still coaching the team would be doing any differently.
I just... I don't understand the logic in these things, or why the GM's that build the flawed teams stay off the hook. Boston isn't a good team. I don't see a single coach capable of making them any better, because the players aren't good enough. Not enough forward depth, and their defense isn't good (2, maybe 3 keepers there out of the 6). I'm no Julien fan, but geez... in my estimation BOS has been maybe overachieving even, given the roster state.
One thing I will agree on is timing being wrong: it was cowardly of them to purposely do it knowing it was the day of the Patriots Super Bowl parade and thus would be buried in the news cycle. It was very much on purpose. They wanted to bury the news as much as they could.
Within a week 3 Finns has done a hat-trick.philou21 wrote:What a nice game the Avalanche played vs MTL! Seems like their win against Winnipeg lifted their spirit. Mtl on the other side REALLY played a bad game so it might be biased a bit.Rantanen was awesome though.
Wait, is this 2003?philou21 wrote:Like most people were expecting, during their 5 days break MTL fired Therrien...to replace him by Julien.What a disaster.
Hahahahaaaa...philou21 wrote:Like most people were expecting, during their 5 days break MTL fired Therrien...to replace him by Julien.What a disaster.