Danny wrote:Overkill. I don't really think the patterns are strong enough to justify regional templates.
I feel that too sometimes but reading what some of you have written before it seems like all Canada (and USA) is not the same.
West : physical players
Central : No idea, good overall players?
East : Good goalies, offensive players?
Remember all players won't use the template, for example, I assume not all western canadian players are physical. Perhaps template is a bad choice of word. Maybe instead of using templates for regions we could decide on the likelihood of certain player types coming out of the west, central or east? For example:
Western Canada:
Forwards
Power forward = 50%
Grinder = 20%
Enforcer = 10%
Sniper = 10%
...
Defensemen
Defensive = 50%
Offensive = 20%
...
Central Canada:
Forwards
Sniper = 25%
Playmaker = 25%
Power Forward = 10%
...
Defensemen
Offensive = 30%
Defensive = 20%
...
Someone with knowledge could estimate these probabilities.
bruins72 wrote:I like the idea of regional templates. Also, if you split the US into West, Central, and East, you could possibly make it so that there are less players created in the West. Most US born hockey players come from the Central (which we call the Mid-west for some reason) and Eastern portions of the country.
I guess the region and nation a new player is born will be inherited from a retired player. So if a player born in New York, New York retires the new one could be born in Miami, Florida. Some players will not inherit anything.
Btw, which states/provinces in USA/Canada are considered west, central and east? are there any defined borders? else we can just decide on something together. After all, some are obvious, some are not.
The design I am working on atm would allow us to easily tweak how players are created and for example add regions to other countries if ever needed. So if things are not perfect from day 1, don't worry.