Here is what I brainstormed, tell me what you think:
dabo wrote:
General Happiness
- Happy to be on the team
- Optimistic about his future on the team
- Wants to be traded
- Sad to be transfer listed
...
- Delighted to be [player name]'s teammate ---> for those who are happy to play with superstars they admire or with players they just get along with very well
- Disgruntled to have to play with [player name]
- Delighted to play for [coach name] / [GM name]
- Disgruntled to play for [coach name] / [GM name]
- Concerned by [player/coach/GM/whoever else's name]'s attitude ----> may be for very professional players who get annoyed by much less professional people on the team for instance, or for any player who doesn't grasp the plans (or lack thereof) a GM has for the team
- Dissatisfied with his ice time
- Wants better linemates -----> might happen if you match a star with a pair of AHL-caliber players for too long
- Concerned by the locker room atmosphere
- Feels like the weakest link on the team ----> For rookies who are not ready and are overwhelmed by the skill gap they have to fill in order to be competitive (might indicate a lack of determination), players playing at a too high caliber for their skills or older players whose skills are far from what they used to be, in which case he'll soon start to consider retirement.
- Considers retiring at the end of the season ---> he might well change his mind if anything he feels good happens in the game
- Retires at the end of the season
- Has personnal issues off the ice ----> this one might come up when a player is in a slump if the player has a professionalism rating below a certain threshold. Same message occuring for a player whose play is on-par with his personnal average or even above would hint at a high professionalism
- Upset that [player name] was traded / [coach name] was fired / etc.
dabo wrote:
Practice Happiness
- Thinks the practice schedule is too hard
- Not enough time to rest
- Happy about the current practice schedule
...
- Concerned that [coach name] might not have the competence to help him raise his game ---> for players playing on teams where the coaching staff is indeed not competent enough, or for players who have a too high opinion of themselves
- Thinks his practice schedule is too light
- Enjoys helping the rookies during training sessions ----> might indicate the player has what it takes to turn to coaching when he hangs his skates
dabo wrote:
Personality types
* Again, not sure how important this is and how it would be incorporated. What do you think? After all this is not a dating service

.
Yeah, it's better if you picture yourself what kind of individual a player is via the hidden attributes hints provided by in-games messages.
dabo wrote:
Reputation
- Virtually unknown
- Local
- Regional
- National
- Continental (I feel it may not be the best, but I can't see any better for now)
- Around the World
I guess every player starts as a 14 (or whatever else) years old virtually unknown kid. A handful who tear up their minor leagues will get noticed some more and could reach the juniors with as high as a regional reputation, national in the case of a generational player. Most would remain a skating bunch of merry unknowns, though.
dabo wrote:
GM Philosophy
- Building from the goalie and out
...
- Building from within ----> prefers to draft a lot and develop a winning team out of all those youngsters. Will prefer trading for young players and perhaps trade for / sign a couple of proven veterans to balance the team a little, add leadership and make up for the kids' eventual mistakes.
- Building from the outside -----> opposite of the other, doesn't give a hoot about the Entry Draft or the team's youth system and prefers to sign FAs and trade for players who have blossomed and shown their worth.
- Building around player X ------> GM acquires / has a franchise player, or what he feels is a franchise player in the making, and crafts a team centered around that player.
Those are extremes, most GMs should range inbetween these and others. Could be attributes for staff?
-YZG