NHL Prospect Research help wanted

Post by **Manimal** » Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:31 pm

WallyWallcakes wrote:Buffalo's top 20 will be done today.

Good job!

Bluejackets17 · Post by **Bluejackets17** » Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:33 pm

I will start on the Blackhawks top 20 today. I will try and have them done ASAP.

Bluejackets17 · Post by **Bluejackets17** » Fri Dec 17, 2010 7:16 pm

The Blackhawks are done and away!

empach · Post by **empach** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 5:57 am

Vancouver rosters should be in your inbox.

Post by **Manimal** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:02 pm

Bluejackets17 wrote:The Blackhawks are done and away!

empach wrote:Vancouver rosters should be in your inbox.

Thank you both!

Post by **visualdarkness** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 8:12 pm

Sorry, got stuck in Västerås but I'll do them as soon after I eaten some very appreciated food...

Doug342 · Post by **Doug342** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 8:50 pm

I'm going to grab Dallas and try my best to get it done tonight.

I'm the guy who did the Senators, just so you know.

Post by **Manimal** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 10:23 pm

Doug342 wrote:I'm going to grab Dallas and try my best to get it done tonight.

I'm the guy who did the Senators, just so you know.

Thanks and welcome to the site!

WallyWallcakes · Post by **WallyWallcakes** » Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:52 pm

Buffalo's finally sent. Sorry. Forgot to on Friday.

Doug342 · Post by **Doug342** » Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:34 pm

I know you sent the first update already, but are you going to have another update when all the rest of the prospect research is done? I'll take the Canadiens next, and I'll make sure to finish it by the 28th or so.

Beukeboom · Post by **Beukeboom** » Wed Dec 22, 2010 3:54 pm

I did some basic work on Panthers and sent it to manimal. Did you get it? If anyone wants to do continue work on them contact me or him, its a good basis i provided i just didnt dare to go into assigning attributes.

tksolway · Post by **tksolway** » Wed Dec 22, 2010 4:14 pm

If you need help with Any other NHL teams, I could help out.

Post by **Manimal** » Wed Dec 22, 2010 7:00 pm

Doug342 wrote:I know you sent the first update already, but are you going to have another update when all the rest of the prospect research is done? I'll take the Canadiens next, and I'll make sure to finish it by the 28th or so.

The next release will be a little longer. I want to add more to it. However, I am having problems with the first release so they might make it into that one if I can't get it to work properly before then

Beukeboom wrote:I did some basic work on Panthers and sent it to manimal. Did you get it? If anyone wants to do continue work on them contact me or him, its a good basis i provided i just didnt dare to go into assigning attributes.

I got it. It is fine and I will complete it

Post by **Manimal** » Wed Dec 22, 2010 7:02 pm

tksolway wrote:If you need help with Any other NHL teams, I could help out.

The Devils are available

Post by **Manimal** » Tue Dec 28, 2010 11:07 am

I have not heard back from a couple researchers in a while so I guess COL, DET and MIN are available

empach · Post by **empach** » Wed Dec 29, 2010 5:27 pm

I'll take Colorado and Detroit.
Are you planning a new update soon or will it be a while?

Post by **Manimal** » Wed Dec 29, 2010 6:50 pm

empach wrote:I'll take Colorado and Detroit.
Are you planning a new update soon or will it be a while?

Not so soon. I have lots I want to add into it.

tksolway · Post by **tksolway** » Wed Dec 29, 2010 7:31 pm

I'll take the Devils and Mini then

tksolway · Post by **tksolway** » Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:37 pm

I've started with the Devils, and I'm finding that the attributes set are above the maximums allowed by his calculated CA, should I lower them to the Max for that CA? Specifically, with Mattias Tedenby he has 16s in his best attributes, which would be fine if his ca was 120, but with those 16s, his ca was set in the 80s in the database. His last season in the Swedish Elite league would give him a CA of 91, or a Max attribute of 14.5.

That all being said, he's now played 20 games in the NHL, and has 8 points. I'd say 4th line player right now or CA of 120. What do you guys think I should do in this type of situation. Should I stick the the Sheet 100% or use my own judgement?

empach · Post by **empach** » Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:58 pm

I always thought you could exceed the CA max when the players talent calls for it - often stuff like speed. Shouldn't happen often but when the situation calls for it.

I've been wondering about players who've made the NHL this year as well. Been doing some work on Colorado, and Shattenkirk gets a CA of 78 based on his season of college last year, but this season he's scored 19 points in 25 NHL games which would justify a CA over 100.

tomisonkol · Post by **tomisonkol** » Thu Dec 30, 2010 8:34 am

I could not help you with prospects Minnesota Wild?
sorry for my bad english ::)

Post by **Manimal** » Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:03 am

tksolway wrote:I've started with the Devils, and I'm finding that the attributes set are above the maximums allowed by his calculated CA, should I lower them to the Max for that CA? Specifically, with Mattias Tedenby he has 16s in his best attributes, which would be fine if his ca was 120, but with those 16s, his ca was set in the 80s in the database. His last season in the Swedish Elite league would give him a CA of 91, or a Max attribute of 14.5.

That all being said, he's now played 20 games in the NHL, and has 8 points. I'd say 4th line player right now or CA of 120. What do you guys think I should do in this type of situation. Should I stick the the Sheet 100% or use my own judgement?

empach wrote:I always thought you could exceed the CA max when the players talent calls for it - often stuff like speed. Shouldn't happen often but when the situation calls for it.

The Max attribute value are more guidelines than rules, so it is ok to have better values.

empach wrote: I've been wondering about players who've made the NHL this year as well. Been doing some work on Colorado, and Shattenkirk gets a CA of 78 based on his season of college last year, but this season he's scored 19 points in 25 NHL games which would justify a CA over 100.

All CA is based upon last year's stats. Feel free to raise them a little bit, though. But not too much

tomisonkol wrote:I could not help you with prospects Minnesota Wild?
sorry for my bad english ::)

TKsolway beat you to it! Sorry, some other time. Thanks for volunteering

empach · Post by **empach** » Thu Dec 30, 2010 6:23 pm

Manimal wrote:
All CA is based upon last year's stats. Feel free to raise them a little bit, though. But not too much

Okay, I may bump Shattenkirk up a bit then to match the Avs other junior defense prospects. Maybe.

Leeman14 · Post by **Leeman14** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:54 pm

St. Louis is done.

Better late than never, I say, but seriously it's been a very busy 2 months.

Cheers,

Leeman14

Post by **Manimal** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:01 pm

Leeman14 wrote:St. Louis is done.

Better late than never, I say, but seriously it's been a very busy 2 months.

Cheers,

Leeman14

Thank you! Good job!

NHL Prospect Research help wanted

Chicago Top 20

Blackhawks done!

Wilds

Re: Wilds

Re: Wilds