Not Allowed: the best policy for fighting?

Discuss specific areas of EHM knowledge; such as players, trading, drafting, tactics, training, practice etc. Teach us what you've discovered or ask others for their thoughts.
Forum rules
Data Editing Forum: Editing the game, databases or saved games. Home of the EHM Editor and the EHM Assistant.

Game Add-ons Forum: Database projects, graphics and sounds. Any discussion which does not relate to editing databases or saved games.

Game Knowledge Discussion: Attributes, coaching, drafting, scouting, tactics and training/practice.

Rosters Forum: Discussion relating to all database and roster projects for Eastside Hockey Manager.

Technical Support: Difficulties, crashes and errors when installing or running the game (and nothing else). Any issues relating to the TBL Rosters must be posted in the TBL Rosters forum. Questions about how to install add-ons must be posted in the Game Add-ons Forum.

General EHM Chat: Anything relating to Eastside Hockey Manager 2004 / 2005 / 2007 / 1 which does not fall within any of the other forums.

Please carry out a forum search before you start a new thread.
Post Reply
FineRedMist
Learning to skate
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2015 8:20 pm
Favourite Team: Dallas Stars

Not Allowed: the best policy for fighting?

Post by FineRedMist »

I'm struggling a little bit with the way penalties are handed out in the game, to say the least. I haven't yet seen a game really turned around by an inspiring fight performance, so the upside of fighting isn't clear to me. And the seemingly inevitable game misconducts -- I'd guess no fewer than 75% of all fights engaged in by my players set to fighting "Allowed" were met with my player (only) receiving 5 for fighting, 2 for instigating, a 10 minute misconduct, and a 10 minute game misconduct -- mean there's a massive, massive downside. Would I be much better off just forbidding my players from fighting?
User avatar
A9L3E
All-Star
Posts: 1230
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:22 am
Custom Rank: Shiny gilded nameplate
Favourite Team: Helsingin Jokerit
Location: Vantaa, Finland

Re: Not Allowed: the best policy for fighting?

Post by A9L3E »

I believe that by not allowing any of your players fight could result in some of your star players fighting. By allowing some players to fight you are also making it clear to others that they should not drop the gloves.
madball1982
Junior League
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:34 am

Re: Not Allowed: the best policy for fighting?

Post by madball1982 »

I've find the above to be true. You can get some strange players fighting if you don't allow anyone too. Fights will occur regardless.

By having a couple of "fighters" in your team you alleviate that. Even if you don't believe in having an enforcer as such, get a Clifford, Martin, Roussel type player along with an Iginla, Stewart, Benn type player and they'll do a vast majority of your FM's.

Although this version of EHM seems to hand out an extraordinary amount of GM's along with it's Instigators.

You'll find most enforcers in this game can still put up a handful of pts across a season. Good enough for a 4th liner with the added benefit of fighting.
User avatar
batdad
The Great One
Posts: 12616
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:46 pm
Custom Rank: Mr Technology
Favourite Team: Syracuse Bulldogs.
Location: Look behind you, you peon

Re: Not Allowed: the best policy for fighting?

Post by batdad »

Sometimes you get strange players fighting no matter what you have as status for others. I had Scott Laughton set to berserk.encouraged for 6 games. In that six games Raffl, Voracek and Streit all had scraps despite being set to no fighting. Laughton? No fights til the 6th game. Simmonds on aggressive and allowed? No fights.

Jacob Trouba is set to aggressive/allowed for 26 games...no fights.
Klefbom--aggressive/allowed---no fights 24 games.
Stone normal.allowed-no fights 25 games

Raffl? Easy/not allowed-2 fights in 26 games.
User avatar
Kopi
Fourth Line
Posts: 425
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 10:21 pm
Location: Slovenia

Re: Not Allowed: the best policy for fighting?

Post by Kopi »

In my challenge now in 2nd season have only Simmonds and Rinaldo set to Allowed and they dont fight much...funny thing is that normaly when i score 1st then it comes to a fight but if im behind then only if i would put on encouraged. So i think it makes sense and its realistic.

1st season of Challenge 36 with Flyers when i played on 4th line with J.Scott - Rinaldo - Stortini and all had on Allowed...and if i put them on Encouraged well there was a fight everytime they were on ice almost. So basicly you need to scout and find a player described as "Enforcer" and he will do damage...either to you or the opponent! :fight:

Batdad, havent had any fights in my game that RAffl was involved.
Post Reply