The review contains numerous additional screenshots which I haven't posted on TBL or social media. So head over to GMGames to take a look.

Thanks.cv81 wrote:You did a great job with this.
Well spotted!Mattias.William wrote:Love how you snuck Sestito in there -- very subtle, masterfully done!
Because it can be customised by editing EHM 2007 databases and then importing them into EHM:EA. Also, for the following reasons:dave1927p wrote:why the high score for customization? So far there isn't much customizable from what I can see...yet
There's a lot of haters on HF Boards. So many angry people.archibalduk wrote:It's interesting how the game and my review have been received by some users on HFBoards. One person described it as propaganda which seemed a bit unfair. I hadn't appreciated that some people would take a computer game review to heart. On reflection, maybe I'd have marked it down one or two points, but not by much. Also, I reviewed it on the basis of being a standalone game rather than reviewing the improvements over EHM 2007 (which I wrote separately as a preview on TBL).
archibalduk wrote:One person described it as propaganda...
Welcome back! Nice to see another old face reappear.Elias26 wrote:Thanks for posting this. I feel that quite a few people (even old EHM players) don't even know that this game exists yet. I found out by accident on reddit today. I never received an email from tbl & the one I got from sigames was titled football manager so I ignored it. I'll do my part in spreading the word tomorrow (I'll be too busy playing tonight) & I'm hoping it can get a front page spot on Steam to give it some traction and keep the EHM franchise alive.
P.S. Good to see all you guys alive & well. I haven't checked the site for over a year now
Absolutely. In retrospect, maybe 96 is a tad on the generous side, but I'd say 90 - 96 is fair nonetheless. I was thinking of writing a bullet point list as to why I rated each category the way I did, but I can't imagine having the time. Ultimately it is only a review and people can take it or leave it.cv81 wrote:I believe your review to be fair. When you line up EHM next to the other sports management games, I can't think of anything that holds a light to it except Football Manager and OOTP. The user ratings back up your analysis. Second highest user rated game after OOTP 16 which is just about how the contributed reviews have gone. It's meant to be fun and reviews are from the writers perspective. Some people are so sensitive. haha
The site is based on sports management games, what do people expect lol. The games are not in competition with electronic arts.
Your review was accurate, concise, and very well-done. I wouldn't worry too much about what other forums are saying, TBL is the only one that really matters.archibalduk wrote:It's interesting how the game and my review have been received by some users on HFBoards. One person described it as propaganda which seemed a bit unfair. I hadn't appreciated that some people would take a computer game review to heart. On reflection, maybe I'd have marked it down one or two points, but not by much. Also, I reviewed it on the basis of being a standalone game rather than reviewing the improvements over EHM 2007 (which I wrote separately as a preview on TBL).