Feedback on the simulation

All general EHM-related discussion goes here. It's the place to chat about gameplay, online gameplay or concepts NOT related to specific topics. Claim bragging rights and impress the community by posting your records! CLICK HERE to purchase your copy of EHM 1.
Forum rules
Data Editing Forum: Editing the game, databases or saved games. Home of the EHM Editor and the EHM Assistant.

Game Add-ons Forum: Database projects, graphics and sounds. Any discussion which does not relate to editing databases or saved games.

Game Knowledge Discussion: Attributes, coaching, drafting, scouting, tactics and training/practice.

Rosters Forum: Discussion relating to all database and roster projects for Eastside Hockey Manager.

Technical Support: Difficulties, crashes and errors when installing or running the game (and nothing else). Any issues relating to the TBL Rosters must be posted in the TBL Rosters forum. Questions about how to install add-ons must be posted in the Game Add-ons Forum.

General EHM Chat: Anything relating to Eastside Hockey Manager 2004 / 2005 / 2007 / 1 which does not fall within any of the other forums.

Please carry out a forum search before you start a new thread.
Post Reply
krownroyal83
Minor League
Posts: 262
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 10:40 am

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by krownroyal83 »

I'd like to see a majority of coaches do it. I'm fine with the more conservative ones not doing it but there is no upside to not doing it. Whether you lose 2-0 or 3-0 the result is still a loss. As far as how important this is, i wouldn't say it's high up there as there are many important issues that need to be corrected and perfected first but at some point the developers should take a look at it.
User avatar
A9L3E
All-Star
Posts: 1230
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:22 am
Custom Rank: Shiny gilded nameplate
Favourite Team: Helsingin Jokerit
Location: Vantaa, Finland

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by A9L3E »

Also, in EHM it seems the empty-net goals are more common than in real life, so it makes sense that AI is more conservative about it.
User avatar
steviewhy
Prospect
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 3:39 pm

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by steviewhy »

Chris Thorburn was the leading scorer on the Jets and in the top 50 in the league when.. they waived him
User avatar
batdad
The Great One
Posts: 12616
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:46 pm
Custom Rank: Mr Technology
Favourite Team: Syracuse Bulldogs.
Location: Look behind you, you peon

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by batdad »

Well yeah, because they know he is really useless to them. But they have bigger problems if he was their leading scorer.
User avatar
steviewhy
Prospect
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 3:39 pm

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by steviewhy »

He had 18 goals at Christmas and got waived December 26th lol
User avatar
umwoz
Minor League
Posts: 229
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 7:27 pm

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by umwoz »

I think the bigger issue is how Thorburn ever got more than 12 goals in an entire year.

That said, in my past experience the game doesn't value production and results in contracts/waivers as much as it does reputation and CA. It's why you see things like this and also why you see guys with a "very good" rep and subpar attributes put up 30-40 goals in a year and then sign for 2.5M.
User avatar
steviewhy
Prospect
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 3:39 pm

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by steviewhy »

That makes sense. I took a closer look at him to see if maybe he'd scored ten goals in two weeks or something but he was legitimately at a goal every other game pace, so somethings off with the AI and Thorburn
krownroyal83
Minor League
Posts: 262
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 10:40 am

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by krownroyal83 »

umwoz wrote:I think the bigger issue is how Thorburn ever got more than 12 goals in an entire year.

That said, in my past experience the game doesn't value production and results in contracts/waivers as much as it does reputation and CA. It's why you see things like this and also why you see guys with a "very good" rep and subpar attributes put up 30-40 goals in a year and then sign for 2.5M.

What does "CA" stand for?
User avatar
nino33
Mr. Goalie
Posts: 6088
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 3:37 am
Custom Rank: Retro Rosters Specialist
Favourite Team: 1970s hockey

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by nino33 »

CA = Current Ability
PA = Potential Ability

The range is 1-200
User avatar
batdad
The Great One
Posts: 12616
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:46 pm
Custom Rank: Mr Technology
Favourite Team: Syracuse Bulldogs.
Location: Look behind you, you peon

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by batdad »

umwoz wrote:I think the bigger issue is how Thorburn ever got more than 12 goals in an entire year.

That said, in my past experience the game doesn't value production and results in contracts/waivers as much as it does reputation and CA. It's why you see things like this and also why you see guys with a "very good" rep and subpar attributes put up 30-40 goals in a year and then sign for 2.5M.

The reputation thing...and it not going up...so demands not going up for contract is an issue for Riz that he is working on I believe. The linkage to Reputation for things like all star game/waivers etc...that is huge as you say...because well....if everyone is very good rep, how on earth does the AI decide who to waive? Need guys able to rise up the rep ranks a little bit better than they are now, and others to drop off based on performance.

A very good player on his way up can easily score 40 goals, (Nick JEnsen) but .... as soon as they get there....they should move to superb. Four season in with 3 40 goal campaigns Jakub VOracek was rated real good. So was a guy in his rookie year in the NHL who played on the fourth line for me (Laughton) and so was the 40 year old Mark Streit.

And yes...hopefully someone has asked SI and RIz on their site to make it a priority to attach more importance to PERFORMANCE for rep boosts/decreases as well as AI Decision making and of course things like awards and all star selections.
krownroyal83
Minor League
Posts: 262
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 10:40 am

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by krownroyal83 »

nino33 wrote:CA = Current Ability
PA = Potential Ability

The range is 1-200
Gotch ya. Even with scouting you can't find those numbers for an individual player in the game i'm assuming?
User avatar
nino33
Mr. Goalie
Posts: 6088
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 3:37 am
Custom Rank: Retro Rosters Specialist
Favourite Team: 1970s hockey

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by nino33 »

krownroyal83 wrote:
nino33 wrote:CA = Current Ability
PA = Potential Ability

The range is 1-200
Gotch ya. Even with scouting you can't find those numbers for an individual player in the game i'm assuming?
That's correct (but you can get a good idea through Scouting, looking at Attributes and player performance)
User avatar
Saapas
Checking Line
Posts: 520
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 11:34 am
Favourite Team: RoKi
Location: Espoo, Finland

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by Saapas »

If a team has delayed penalty coming the other teams goalie doesn't go to bench for the 6th player :-k
User avatar
KevT90
Drafted
Posts: 176
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:03 am
Location: New-Brunswick, Canada

Tactics and Quick sim

Post by KevT90 »

I can imagine that tactics while using the enhanced simulation are having a big/bigger effect.

Does someone know if the tactics (team/unit/personal tactics) actually have an effect at all while using the quick sim simulation ?
flamesfan2313
Learning to skate
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 8:45 pm
Favourite Team: calgary flames

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by flamesfan2313 »

Its year 2 and Hossa, Keith, and Voracek were all waived. ](*,)
User avatar
batdad
The Great One
Posts: 12616
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:46 pm
Custom Rank: Mr Technology
Favourite Team: Syracuse Bulldogs.
Location: Look behind you, you peon

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by batdad »

Good grief. Kelowna Rockets sent Tyson Baillie at age 19 to Junior B Okotoks. Really? Guy was 3rd on your team in scoring in the first season of EHM. Ugh.
Pensfan66
Junior League
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:21 pm

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by Pensfan66 »

Trading up in the draft is to hard and unrealistic, trying to move up to the 2nd pick and offered Malkin, kovalchuck, letang, 19th pick and 24th just to see if they would take it and still turned down.
User avatar
batdad
The Great One
Posts: 12616
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:46 pm
Custom Rank: Mr Technology
Favourite Team: Syracuse Bulldogs.
Location: Look behind you, you peon

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by batdad »

Not really. How often does it actually happen in real life where a team manages to trade into the top 3? IT should be really really hard IMHO. Should have to be overpayment. Don't get me wrong I get what you are saying re your trade offer, but is that a realistic deal? Not from either side because of the cap.
User avatar
Peter_Doherty
Hall of Fame
Posts: 1850
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:39 pm
Favourite Team: New York Rangers
Location: Sweden

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by Peter_Doherty »

Yeah, a deal where you jump from 19th OA to 2nd really shouldn't be possible, i don't think a trade like that has ever happened and i doubt it ever will (might be wrong since my NHL-history knowledge ain't perfect).
Pensfan66
Junior League
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:21 pm

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by Pensfan66 »

3rd overall pick and he 4th turned me down for the same offer too. So now Noah hanifan and Dylan strome are worth more than Malkin, kovy, Letang and 19th and 24th picks. If any gm in real life turned that down they would be fired on the spot. It needs to be fixed, shouldn't be anywhere near as easy as last game but needs to be tuned down Alittle. And all the teams I offered could fit them all under cap
User avatar
Peter_Doherty
Hall of Fame
Posts: 1850
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:39 pm
Favourite Team: New York Rangers
Location: Sweden

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by Peter_Doherty »

You do realize how much salary you are shipping away right? Have you tried adding a few cap dumps from their team?
Pensfan66
Junior League
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:21 pm

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by Pensfan66 »

Yes. Also saying that trading into the top 3 doesn't happen, the year the lightning took drouin 3rd overall a rumor which was later confirmed was they offered pittsburgh the 3rd overall and choice of prospect for letang and shero was gonna pull the trigger but it got vetoed by morehouse because letang was to marketable.
User avatar
Edgars
Top Prospect
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2013 6:37 am
Location: Rīga, Latvija

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by Edgars »

Pensfan66 wrote:If any gm in real life turned that down they would be fired on the spot.
The same would be said by oposite - if any GM would offer other GM such a deal as you have described he would be fired on the spot and that's the reason why game don't allow such things to happen in the first place!
User avatar
batdad
The Great One
Posts: 12616
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:46 pm
Custom Rank: Mr Technology
Favourite Team: Syracuse Bulldogs.
Location: Look behind you, you peon

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by batdad »

Islanders offered every pick they have to a team for the Nathan McKinnon pick, at least I think it was that year. Turned down out of hand. Like immediately. Snow was not fired, neither was the other GM. So....to conclude this...trades that try to take advantage of AI and cannot happen in the game, good thing. Trades that are offered and refused just like they would be in real life....Good thing. Trades that have human GMs in game trying to screw the AI and are refused good thing.

Not sure where the bad is here. Realism is what we want right? Not EA Sports?
User avatar
lafontaine83
Prospect
Posts: 60
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2015 6:05 pm
Favourite Team: Ottawa Senators

Re: Feedback on the simulation

Post by lafontaine83 »

Yeah I'm glad the game didn't give you that trade.

In real life, that trade would never happen... why?

Because the team taking on the big end couldn't have room for them. You assumed the game would allow it... and it didn't.

I'm glad.

It's a simulation, and stupid stuff like that doesn't happen. Kudos to the game.
Post Reply