Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
Moderator: Challenge Moderators
- bruins72
- TBL Admin Team
- Posts: 14513
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:13 pm
- Custom Rank: Challenge Guy
- Favourite Team: Boston Bruins
- Location: Taunton, MA
Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
All Challenge #43 talk goes here!
- Peter_Doherty
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:39 pm
- Favourite Team: New York Rangers
- Location: Sweden
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
This will be fun! 
Edit: Oh wow, this team is much worse then i thought they would be, sure will be a challenge to start atleast.

Edit: Oh wow, this team is much worse then i thought they would be, sure will be a challenge to start atleast.
Last edited by Peter_Doherty on Tue Sep 20, 2016 6:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- bruins72
- TBL Admin Team
- Posts: 14513
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:13 pm
- Custom Rank: Challenge Guy
- Favourite Team: Boston Bruins
- Location: Taunton, MA
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
That first draft is going to be very interesting. There are so many guys that you could be justified in taking #1 overall. Shea Weber is ranked #1 overall but if you didn't want to go with defense, you've got a lot of interesting centers there (and this Blackhawks team is thin down the middle). You've got guys like Staal, Carter, Bergeron, and Getzlaf there. You could take a winger like Perry or Eriksson. Or a goalie like Crawford of Fleury. You've even got some other interesting options at defense but I'm not quite sure they're on Weber's level. My hope is that somebody drafts off the board and I'm able to pick up a stud with that Senators' first round pick.
- Peter_Doherty
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:39 pm
- Favourite Team: New York Rangers
- Location: Sweden
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
Even the prospects on this team are bad, what did the last GM do? 
b72, i'm probably not going Weber, really think this team needs a future #1 C. I really hope one of Burns, Big Buf or Suter drop to our second 1st rounder, i doubt any will but i sure do hope.

b72, i'm probably not going Weber, really think this team needs a future #1 C. I really hope one of Burns, Big Buf or Suter drop to our second 1st rounder, i doubt any will but i sure do hope.
- bruins72
- TBL Admin Team
- Posts: 14513
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:13 pm
- Custom Rank: Challenge Guy
- Favourite Team: Boston Bruins
- Location: Taunton, MA
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
But at least we've got Bouwmeester as a prospect!
- Peter_Doherty
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:39 pm
- Favourite Team: New York Rangers
- Location: Sweden
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
I think i'm going to trade J-Bouw, i want puck moving D-men during this challenge.
- bruins72
- TBL Admin Team
- Posts: 14513
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:13 pm
- Custom Rank: Challenge Guy
- Favourite Team: Boston Bruins
- Location: Taunton, MA
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
Sign him first!
I think I'll keep him. He and Phillips are going to be the backbone of my defense.
We've also got Hartnell as a good prospect. He's only 20 years old. Sturm is 24 and already good. Ott is 20 and looking like a good defensive forward. Moulson looks like he can develop into a decent 2nd line wing. He's only 19 years old. There's some decent youngsters in the system but almost all of them are already under contract with the team.
I sure do hope there's some decent staff available in the off-season. My whole coaching staff needs to go, with the exception of the goalie coach. Most of the scouts are trash too.
EDIT:
And because I'm spending so much time looking at stuff and trying to scout, I'm still in April!](./images/smilies/wallbash.gif)
I think I'll keep him. He and Phillips are going to be the backbone of my defense.
We've also got Hartnell as a good prospect. He's only 20 years old. Sturm is 24 and already good. Ott is 20 and looking like a good defensive forward. Moulson looks like he can develop into a decent 2nd line wing. He's only 19 years old. There's some decent youngsters in the system but almost all of them are already under contract with the team.
I sure do hope there's some decent staff available in the off-season. My whole coaching staff needs to go, with the exception of the goalie coach. Most of the scouts are trash too.
EDIT:
And because I'm spending so much time looking at stuff and trying to scout, I'm still in April!
](./images/smilies/wallbash.gif)
- Peter_Doherty
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:39 pm
- Favourite Team: New York Rangers
- Location: Sweden
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
Yeah, i'll remember to sign him first
Yeah, we have a few good young players, but i see no first liners among them and no C's at all. Actually, Plotnikov looks pretty decent. J-Bouw looks like a great prospect, just doesn't fit the mold i'm trying out this time. Thought the scouts atleast look OK, could definitely use a couple new ones but it's not THAT bad

Yeah, we have a few good young players, but i see no first liners among them and no C's at all. Actually, Plotnikov looks pretty decent. J-Bouw looks like a great prospect, just doesn't fit the mold i'm trying out this time. Thought the scouts atleast look OK, could definitely use a couple new ones but it's not THAT bad

- bruins72
- TBL Admin Team
- Posts: 14513
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:13 pm
- Custom Rank: Challenge Guy
- Favourite Team: Boston Bruins
- Location: Taunton, MA
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
Plotnikov does look good but he's got the "may have trouble adapting to life in North America" thing. 

- Peter_Doherty
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:39 pm
- Favourite Team: New York Rangers
- Location: Sweden
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
Yeah, i'm leaving him in Europe for now.
- Peter_Doherty
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:39 pm
- Favourite Team: New York Rangers
- Location: Sweden
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
I'm at the draft now, such a tough choice for me between Eric Staal and Patrice Bergeron. Staal looks better now but i love Bergerons game and he looks to become the more well rounded player, decisions decisions.
Edit: Went with Bergeron even though all my scouts wanted Staal over him
Now for the second decision, both Byfuglien and Goligoski available for my next pick 
Edit: Went with Bergeron even though all my scouts wanted Staal over him


- stone169
- Checking Line
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:48 pm
- Favourite Team: Ottawa Senators
- Location: Southern Ontario
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
You things are really bad up front with your team when your assistant GM has Samuel Pahlsson listed as your #1 center.
- bruins72
- TBL Admin Team
- Posts: 14513
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:13 pm
- Custom Rank: Challenge Guy
- Favourite Team: Boston Bruins
- Location: Taunton, MA
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
LOL! Pahlsson? Yikes!
Smart move taking Bergeron! I think Buffy might be the better of those two choices on D (in this save).
Smart move taking Bergeron! I think Buffy might be the better of those two choices on D (in this save).
- Peter_Doherty
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:39 pm
- Favourite Team: New York Rangers
- Location: Sweden
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
Done with the draft, ended up with these players, in order: Patrice Bergeron, Dustin Byfuglien, Brian Elliott, Eric Fehr, Dan Fritsche, Willie Burnes, Ossi Häkkinen and James Thomas. Went a bit off script with Bergeron and Elliott but feel good with this draft 
The biggest 'problem' with taking Bergeron over Staal is that Staal looks more or less NHL ready while Bergeron needs a season or two before he's ready.

The biggest 'problem' with taking Bergeron over Staal is that Staal looks more or less NHL ready while Bergeron needs a season or two before he's ready.
- bruins72
- TBL Admin Team
- Posts: 14513
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:13 pm
- Custom Rank: Challenge Guy
- Favourite Team: Boston Bruins
- Location: Taunton, MA
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
I'd rather do better over several years than just one or two.
- stone169
- Checking Line
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:48 pm
- Favourite Team: Ottawa Senators
- Location: Southern Ontario
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
It's funny that they'd make Staal NHL ready and not Bergeron, considering Bergeron headed straight to Boston.Peter_Doherty wrote:Done with the draft, ended up with these players, in order: Patrice Bergeron, Dustin Byfuglien, Brian Elliott, Eric Fehr, Dan Fritsche, Willie Burnes, Ossi Häkkinen and James Thomas. Went a bit off script with Bergeron and Elliott but feel good with this draft
The biggest 'problem' with taking Bergeron over Staal is that Staal looks more or less NHL ready while Bergeron needs a season or two before he's ready.
- bruins72
- TBL Admin Team
- Posts: 14513
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:13 pm
- Custom Rank: Challenge Guy
- Favourite Team: Boston Bruins
- Location: Taunton, MA
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
And IRL Bergeron was a second rounder that wasn't as highly touted as some others.
That makes the fact that he forced his way onto the roster as an 18 year old even better. Big props to Martin Lapointe for taking Bergeron into his home with his family to help him make the adjustment. I think more veterans should do that with rookies. It teaches them how to be a professional.

- Peter_Doherty
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:39 pm
- Favourite Team: New York Rangers
- Location: Sweden
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
Not sure Bergeron will become better either, i just like his particular skillset better for what i'm trying to do with this teambruins72 wrote:I'd rather do better over several years than just one or two.

- CJ
- TBL Rosters Researcher
- Posts: 3411
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 6:34 pm
- Custom Rank: Formerly jhcjobpb
- Favourite Team: Florida Panthers
- Location: Finland
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
I had planed to participate in this challenge. It would have been my first challenge.
But as my NHL research/work for the new TBL rosters takes so much time I think I'll have to skip. 


- stone169
- Checking Line
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:48 pm
- Favourite Team: Ottawa Senators
- Location: Southern Ontario
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
That was probably one of the worst drafts I've ever had. The players I had on my list were all gone by the end of the 2nd round. Clearly this will be something I will have to address in the off season.
Here's my picks:
1st Patrice Bergeron
22nd Alex Goligoski
31st Brad Richardson
58th Eric Fehr
61st Clayton Stoner
91st Mike Lundin
121st Daniel Winnik
151st Grant Clitsome
181st James Thomas
It was tough passing up on Eric Staal and Shea Weber, but I just felt that Patrice would be the better fit with what I want to do with the team.
Here's my picks:
1st Patrice Bergeron
22nd Alex Goligoski
31st Brad Richardson
58th Eric Fehr
61st Clayton Stoner
91st Mike Lundin
121st Daniel Winnik
151st Grant Clitsome
181st James Thomas
It was tough passing up on Eric Staal and Shea Weber, but I just felt that Patrice would be the better fit with what I want to do with the team.
- Peter_Doherty
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:39 pm
- Favourite Team: New York Rangers
- Location: Sweden
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
I was thinking so hard about that pick #31, went with Elliott to secure some depth at G (he was the only potentially good one left), but was seriously considering Zajac, O'Brien and Purcell.
- stone169
- Checking Line
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:48 pm
- Favourite Team: Ottawa Senators
- Location: Southern Ontario
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
I just realized that I made a trade when I wasn't supposed supposed to. I drafted Eric Fehr with that pick. Thankfully I can go back.
- stone169
- Checking Line
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:48 pm
- Favourite Team: Ottawa Senators
- Location: Southern Ontario
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
Still a horrible draft. So did it over because I made a trade before the draft and the rule stipulate, that I cannot do anything of the sort until July 1st.
Here are my picks:
1st Patrice Bergeron
22nd Alex Goligoski
31st Teddy Purcell
61st Brian Boyle
91st Tobias Enstrom
121st Karl Meyhoff
151st James Thomas
181st Ossi Hakkinen
Here are my picks:
1st Patrice Bergeron
22nd Alex Goligoski
31st Teddy Purcell
61st Brian Boyle
91st Tobias Enstrom
121st Karl Meyhoff
151st James Thomas
181st Ossi Hakkinen
- bruins72
- TBL Admin Team
- Posts: 14513
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:13 pm
- Custom Rank: Challenge Guy
- Favourite Team: Boston Bruins
- Location: Taunton, MA
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
That's a bummer. I get it though. Manimal has run into that too. Thanks for the hard work though.CJ wrote:I had planed to participate in this challenge. It would have been my first challenge.But as my NHL research/work for the new TBL rosters takes so much time I think I'll have to skip.
- nino33
- Mr. Goalie
- Posts: 6088
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 3:37 am
- Custom Rank: Retro Rosters Specialist
- Favourite Team: 1970s hockey
Re: Challenge #43 - 2003 Blackhawks Discussion Thread
Yeah, I know how you feel!...I played a year and a half of the Dallas Stars Challenge (Challenge 20!), and didn't play the two 1974 databases Challenges though I wanted to...the editing bug is very strong for some of us! HaHaCJ wrote:I had planed to participate in this challenge. It would have been my first challenge.But as my NHL research/work for the new TBL rosters takes so much time I think I'll have to skip.
Outside of some online play the Challenge was the only time I "played" EHM; I really enjoyed my time as the Dallas Star GM, brief though it was
