World Cup Hockey 2016

Want to discuss any hockey related issues? Heard some interesting news? Watched a great game? Heard an interesting rumor or quote? Talk about it here! CONTAINS SPOILERS!
User avatar
nino33
Mr. Goalie
Posts: 6088
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 3:37 am
Custom Rank: Retro Rosters Specialist
Favourite Team: 1970s hockey

Re: World Cup Hockey 2016

Post by nino33 »

ClassicSwarley wrote:All of my interest in this tournament died when Team Europe made the final.
I think the same thing happened to Canada's players to be honest
It's not the North American way to "run up the score" and hard to get motivated against competition you don't believe can actually beat you
Bam_Margera
Drafted
Posts: 158
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2016 11:46 am
Favourite Team: Edmonton Oilers
Location: Austria

Re: World Cup Hockey 2016

Post by Bam_Margera »

nino33 wrote:I (like almost everyone) couldn't stand the format with the "fake teams" but the Olympics aren't the answer IMO, a real World Cup is (with soccer/football the Olympics aren't a big deal compared to the World Cup, I think hockey could be the same way)
No wonder a U23-tourney draws less interest than a "best-on-best" tournament.
nino33 wrote:I don't understand the big deal made of the Olympics myself, especially the focus on the ratings/number of people watching - so many (almost all) Olympic events have essentially no coverage/significant interest from anyone outside of a couple weeks every 4 years
It's not the goal to have only the popular sports in the Olympics, but to showcase sports that have to fight for financial support in their countries. If you take only the covered sports, what would be left at the Summer Olympics? Some running, some swimming, football, tennis and on a side note basketball, volleyball, handball.
nino33 wrote:The World Championships mean nothing to me (and almost all North Americans), and the Olympics are probably the most boring of all hockey played...
And a lot of Europeans do not care about the NHL, but about their domestic leagues and the "World's" (as it is called across the pond).
User avatar
nino33
Mr. Goalie
Posts: 6088
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 3:37 am
Custom Rank: Retro Rosters Specialist
Favourite Team: 1970s hockey

Re: World Cup Hockey 2016

Post by nino33 »

Bam_Margera wrote:No wonder a U23-tourney draws less interest than a "best-on-best" tournament.
But it's "the Olympics" :-D you basically explained why North Americans don't care much about the Worlds (it's not "best on best")


Bam_Margera wrote:It's not the goal to have only the popular sports in the Olympics, but to showcase sports that have to fight for financial support in their countries.
That's a nice goal...who pays for it is the question? The Olympics are losing ground/dying out IMO.....they cost way to much, fewer cities are interested, fewer fans are interested (IMO in the modern/internet age a city/country doesn't need to spend billions it doesn't have to "put itself on the map" anymore)


Bam_Margera wrote:And a lot of Europeans do not care about the NHL, but about their domestic leagues and the "World's" (as it is called across the pond).
I'm not sure how that matters in regards to getting quality hockey.....to have the best leagues/tournaments you need the players, and the players want to get paid top dollar and thus they're in the NHL (I agree that Europeans do seem to care about their leagues/the Worlds, but not anywhere near enough to actually pay what would be required for tickets/TV contracts/etc to have their best players involved & the European players don't care enough to take the significant pay cut to play in their domestic leagues/more international tournaments)

I care about my local NASL team and their current fight to make the playoffs, but I don't think many Europeans do HaHa I'm not even sure the NASL is in FM! :-D
Bam_Margera
Drafted
Posts: 158
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2016 11:46 am
Favourite Team: Edmonton Oilers
Location: Austria

Re: World Cup Hockey 2016

Post by Bam_Margera »

nino33 wrote:
Bam_Margera wrote:It's not the goal to have only the popular sports in the Olympics, but to showcase sports that have to fight for financial support in their countries.
That's a nice goal...who pays for it is the question? The Olympics are losing ground/dying out IMO.....they cost way to much, fewer cities are interested, fewer fans are interested (IMO in the modern/internet age a city/country doesn't need to spend billions it doesn't have to "put itself on the map" anymore)
They only cost too much because the host cities are not able to plan accordingly and cost-effective. Because they think they'll need a new arena there, a or overdimensioned arenas for sports that are not played in the country (e.g. baseball in Greece).
nino33 wrote:
Bam_Margera wrote:And a lot of Europeans do not care about the NHL, but about their domestic leagues and the "World's" (as it is called across the pond).
I'm not sure how that matters in regards to getting quality hockey.....to have the best leagues/tournaments you need the players, and the players want to get paid top dollar and thus they're in the NHL (I agree that Europeans do seem to care about their leagues/the Worlds, but not anywhere near enough to actually pay what would be required for tickets/TV contracts/etc to have their best players involved & the European players don't care enough to take the significant pay cut to play in their domestic leagues/more international tournaments)

I care about my local NASL team and their current fight to make the playoffs, but I don't think many Europeans do HaHa I'm not even sure the NASL is in FM! :-D
Fan standards in Europe still differ from NA. While in North America 99% would cheer for any team in their city, in Europe people are linked to their clubs, which have their own club history, their own youth program and so on. This american franchise-system is not that much etablished here, you have inner city rivalries when there are multiple teams. What I mean to say is: It's not always top-notch-hockey people are craving for, but they get brought to a hockey game by their fathers for example when they are young and then they stick to that team. There is not as much gloryhunting. If the Oilers get moved to somewhere else and after a couple of decades the Edmonton Carbondioxes (got to stay true to the oil industry ;) ) get awarded an NHL franchise people will jump on it, because it is about NHL-hockey and not the team.
User avatar
nino33
Mr. Goalie
Posts: 6088
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 3:37 am
Custom Rank: Retro Rosters Specialist
Favourite Team: 1970s hockey

Re: World Cup Hockey 2016

Post by nino33 »

Bam_Margera wrote: Fan standards in Europe still differ from NA. While in North America 99% would cheer for any team in their city, in Europe people are linked to their clubs, which have their own club history, their own youth program and so on. This american franchise-system is not that much etablished here, you have inner city rivalries when there are multiple teams. What I mean to say is: It's not always top-notch-hockey people are craving for, but they get brought to a hockey game by their fathers for example when they are young and then they stick to that team. There is not as much gloryhunting. If the Oilers get moved to somewhere else and after a couple of decades the Edmonton Carbondioxes (got to stay true to the oil industry ;) ) get awarded an NHL franchise people will jump on it, because it is about NHL-hockey and not the team.
I disagree...you're not describing the North American sports world that I know
The history of NA sports clubs/leagues goes back 100 years or more too

There's city rivalries in North America too, regardless of the sport (like Edmonton/Calgary), and large cities have inner city rivalries, and teams having their own "youth program" is what the NHL was until the 1960s (and Edmonton FC, the NASL team I've fallen in love with, have their own youth program), and I don't think fans in Canadian cities and the US cities with a hockey history are "gloryhunting" (just like European fans, they support "their team" while the US cities with little to no hockey history could pretty much care less about hockey); Edmonton fans supported "their team" long before they made the NHL

I think a problem with the "youth program" idea in NA is I don't think a team can legally "own" a minor like that (but trust me, there are similar "programs" in NA, just not as connected to the top professional teams); also worth noting is it seems many top European hockey players (including prejunior) come to NA to play, just like the pros come to NA to play



I've lived in Edmonton for 26 years and have never been an Oilers fan; I grew up in B.C. and was a Flyers fan in my youth; whenever the Leafs or Habs play in any other Canadian city there's support for them.....outside of the top football/soccer leagues in Europe any comparison about sports cultures shouldn't include the NHL IMO (anything outside of the top football/soccer leagues isn't even in the same league as the NHL)

And I totally get the "not always about top notch" as that's why I've fallen in love with the NASL...I love the "small time" atmosphere and connectedness/localness and talking to those around me about the game without blaring music/etc ruining the experience (that's how hockey was when I was growing up, and how small town Major Junior still is - maybe you don't know, but I'm not an NHL fan, and part of the reason is because of the "entertainment" that ruins the atmosphere/environment IMO)

There's many, many other examples I could give that would show the similarity between NA and Europe (most not at the NHL level).

And imagine if in European countries, like in North America, you could easily get TV/reporter coverage of any team in any league in primetime (and much of it on basic TV)...then people would have a real choice, and may not always support the local team (when I was a preteen I'd be lucky to see the Flyers play a handful of times a year, and had to rely on the weekly Hockey News for what little I got while now if I wanted I could watch every Flyer game and read the coverage from the local reporters/opinions from the local fans)

I've seen the attendance and financial figures of the hockey in Europe, and it's likely high school football in the states does better (most definitely all the college/pro sports do) - so IMO if you want to say what you're saying, you need to keep in mind in NA only a small fraction of fans need to be the same as what you're describing to have the same number of the type of fans you're describing
User avatar
CJ
TBL Rosters Researcher
Posts: 3411
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 6:34 pm
Custom Rank: Formerly jhcjobpb
Favourite Team: Florida Panthers
Location: Finland

Re: World Cup Hockey 2016

Post by CJ »

You guys went a bit too off-topic now. ;)
User avatar
nino33
Mr. Goalie
Posts: 6088
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 3:37 am
Custom Rank: Retro Rosters Specialist
Favourite Team: 1970s hockey

Re: World Cup Hockey 2016

Post by nino33 »

CJ wrote:You guys went a bit too off-topic now. ;)
True/you're right...but it's more interesting than World Cup talk :-D
User avatar
CJ
TBL Rosters Researcher
Posts: 3411
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 6:34 pm
Custom Rank: Formerly jhcjobpb
Favourite Team: Florida Panthers
Location: Finland

Re: World Cup Hockey 2016

Post by CJ »

nino33 wrote:
CJ wrote:You guys went a bit too off-topic now. ;)
True/you're right... but it's more interesting than World Cup talk :-D
Copying you: True/you're right... :-D
Post Reply