Harper wrote:I'm in the 2010-2011 season and it was for vintage.
Why wait for 2.0 to develop when you can get the original that is already good?
I play as Philly.



Harper wrote:I'm in the 2010-2011 season and it was for vintage.
Why wait for 2.0 to develop when you can get the original that is already good?
I play as Philly.
Nope, got him after his first contract expired, I think...Minstrel wrote:Harper wrote:I'm in the 2010-2011 season and it was for vintage.
Why wait for 2.0 to develop when you can get the original that is already good?
I play as Philly.Gotcha. I thought you might be later on, he should be awesome at that point. In testing when guys were running games out to like 2030 I saw some career stats for him and Crosby that were down right silly
![]()
Systemfel wrote:Maybe this wasn't my best trade ever, but it sure is the weirdest one.
As the Wild GM, I sent Pierre-Marc Bouchard to the 'Canes, which I was very happy about.
In exchange I received:
Forward Erik Cole
A 2nd round pick in 2006
A 3rd round pick in 2007
A 5th round pick in 2006
A 6th round pick in 2006
A 7th round pick in 2006
How crazy is that?!
Thats a nice deal. Why the heck can't I ever make deals like that.Minstrel wrote: After not being able to trade up to the top four picks I instead traded down my 9th overall (they took Ben Maxwell) to Chicago for Cam Barker, Duncan Keith, two 6ths and a 7th.
Is Mike O'Connell still the GM in your game? That could explain a lot.E5150_ca wrote:Another one:
I traded...
Eric Lindros (who just came off a 3 month injury)
Luke Richardson
6th round pick
to the Bruins in exchange for:
1st round pick
Brad Boyes
Tanebe
I also managed to get Andrew Raycroft for dirt cheap.... Bruins GM ain't so smart in this one...
It's typical. They're good enough to be competetive but not good enough to win.E5150_ca wrote:Yup he is, but even with the silly trades, Bruins are still playing above .500 hockey and 3 points behind the 5th place team. (Mid-way through the season)bruins72 wrote: Is Mike O'Connell still the GM in your game? That could explain a lot.
The financial staff not liking a deal has a lot more figured into it than simple numbers; it has to do with it not matching their team plan it takes into consideration the length of contracts/when players might become free agents and the cost it might entail to bringin another player for the same role.Habslife wrote:A bit outta subject but I tried trading Zubrus(1,5M$) for datsyuk(3,5M$)and a 4th round DP(To play with ovvy and afinogenov, red line), the GM thought it was a possible but the financial staff didnt like this deal at all...
what's the problem, theyre saving 2m$