The Official 2007 NHL Off-season Transactions Thread
- batdad
- The Great One
- Posts: 12616
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:46 pm
- Custom Rank: Mr Technology
- Favourite Team: Syracuse Bulldogs.
- Location: Look behind you, you peon
- batdad
- The Great One
- Posts: 12616
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:46 pm
- Custom Rank: Mr Technology
- Favourite Team: Syracuse Bulldogs.
- Location: Look behind you, you peon
- bruins72
- TBL Admin Team
- Posts: 14513
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:13 pm
- Custom Rank: Challenge Guy
- Favourite Team: Boston Bruins
- Location: Taunton, MA
- batdad
- The Great One
- Posts: 12616
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:46 pm
- Custom Rank: Mr Technology
- Favourite Team: Syracuse Bulldogs.
- Location: Look behind you, you peon
- Danny
- Stanley Cup Winner
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:40 pm
- Danny
- Stanley Cup Winner
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:40 pm
Parise re-signed. Terms undisclosed yet.
http://devils.nhl.com/team/app/?service ... eid=335555
http://devils.nhl.com/team/app/?service ... eid=335555
- Systemfel
- Leading Scorer
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 5:56 pm
- Location: Sweden
It's apparently $12.5M over four years. Good signing for NJ.Danny wrote:Parise re-signed. Terms undisclosed yet.
http://devils.nhl.com/team/app/?service ... eid=335555
- white knight
- Top Prospect
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:20 pm
- Location: Sthlm (25%) - NY (75%)
To keep your rights for a player who's contract is ending and who is eligible for restricted free agency, the team have to make a qualifying offer. Otherwise the player will turn unristricted free agent come July 1st!
If you tender an offersheet to a restricted free agent, the team who owns his rights have 7 days to match the offersheet - if they decide not to match, they will recieve compensation in form of draft picks. How many draftpicks, and how high draftpicks they get is based on the salary offered to the player by the outside team. For instance, in the Penner deal, the Ducks would get a 1st round, 2nd round, and 3rd round from the Oilers and in the Vanek deal, the Sabres would get four 1st round picks from the Oilers.
About arbitration - if a rfa and his team cannot get a deal done or the player thinks that he would get more money by letting an arbitration judge decide his salary, the two parts will go to salary arbitration. This means that the team will put an offer on the table and the player will put the salary that he feels he deserves on the table. Then the two parts will argue why they think the player deserves (or not deserves) what he wants. This could get nasty, as in the Avery situation, as the team will argue why the player doesn't deserve his demanded (or wanted) salary and why the arbitration judge should rule in favor of their offer. After the judge have made his ruling, the team will either accept the ruling and sign the player, as in Avery's case to a one-year (always one-year deals in arbitration) deal paying him $1.9M. If they don't accept the ruling, the player will become an unristricted free agent...
I hope that's what you wanted to know...
If you tender an offersheet to a restricted free agent, the team who owns his rights have 7 days to match the offersheet - if they decide not to match, they will recieve compensation in form of draft picks. How many draftpicks, and how high draftpicks they get is based on the salary offered to the player by the outside team. For instance, in the Penner deal, the Ducks would get a 1st round, 2nd round, and 3rd round from the Oilers and in the Vanek deal, the Sabres would get four 1st round picks from the Oilers.
About arbitration - if a rfa and his team cannot get a deal done or the player thinks that he would get more money by letting an arbitration judge decide his salary, the two parts will go to salary arbitration. This means that the team will put an offer on the table and the player will put the salary that he feels he deserves on the table. Then the two parts will argue why they think the player deserves (or not deserves) what he wants. This could get nasty, as in the Avery situation, as the team will argue why the player doesn't deserve his demanded (or wanted) salary and why the arbitration judge should rule in favor of their offer. After the judge have made his ruling, the team will either accept the ruling and sign the player, as in Avery's case to a one-year (always one-year deals in arbitration) deal paying him $1.9M. If they don't accept the ruling, the player will become an unristricted free agent...
I hope that's what you wanted to know...
- white knight
- Top Prospect
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:20 pm
- Location: Sthlm (25%) - NY (75%)
- white knight
- Top Prospect
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:20 pm
- Location: Sthlm (25%) - NY (75%)
- getzlaf15
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1932
- Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:33 pm
- Custom Rank: TBL Update Team
- white knight
- Top Prospect
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:20 pm
- Location: Sthlm (25%) - NY (75%)
That's right. We're comin' up on the day with the big D... I actually think that Burke will let Penner leave and take the draftpicks he get's for him... Lowe is clearly overpaying for Penner and what it all will come down to is the fact that Burke needs to resign both Corey Perry and Ryan Getzlaf next summer... And if he decides to match Penner, that contract will set the tone for those negotiations... Perry and Getzlaf are clearly more important pieces of the Ducks pie than Penner...
- batdad
- The Great One
- Posts: 12616
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:46 pm
- Custom Rank: Mr Technology
- Favourite Team: Syracuse Bulldogs.
- Location: Look behind you, you peon
Rumor has it-Burke was one of the first guys to call Nonis and say "You have to match, you have to match. It will screw up the entire league if you don't" Then 27 other GMS (including Lowe, excluding Clarke) called and did the same.
If Burke does not match, he is just as bad as Lowe. Well...almost as bad. He cannot let this happen. It will open too many floodgates. Brian will not be the one to let this go. I bet he got calls from 28 GMS...including Paul Holmgren.
I say no way, no how does he let Penner go. He will not want to be the first guy.
But I have been wrong before...once.
If Burke does not match, he is just as bad as Lowe. Well...almost as bad. He cannot let this happen. It will open too many floodgates. Brian will not be the one to let this go. I bet he got calls from 28 GMS...including Paul Holmgren.
I say no way, no how does he let Penner go. He will not want to be the first guy.
But I have been wrong before...once.

- white knight
- Top Prospect
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:20 pm
- Location: Sthlm (25%) - NY (75%)
- getzlaf15
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1932
- Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:33 pm
- Custom Rank: TBL Update Team
100% agreed, the ducks i honestly believe will not match the offer, even though i like Penner, Perry and Getzlaf are huge in the future success of the team, and we can't afford to have the same thing happen to them that has happened to Penner, otherwise we're screwedwhite knight wrote:That's right. We're comin' up on the day with the big D... I actually think that Burke will let Penner leave and take the draftpicks he get's for him... Lowe is clearly overpaying for Penner and what it all will come down to is the fact that Burke needs to resign both Corey Perry and Ryan Getzlaf next summer... And if he decides to match Penner, that contract will set the tone for those negotiations... Perry and Getzlaf are clearly more important pieces of the Ducks pie than Penner...
- batdad
- The Great One
- Posts: 12616
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:46 pm
- Custom Rank: Mr Technology
- Favourite Team: Syracuse Bulldogs.
- Location: Look behind you, you peon
No way Burke is the first to let one walk. No way, just cannot see it. Time to put up or shut up about poaching and salary increases that are drug incduced Brian. Today it is time.
I just believe there is too much pride in Brian to not match. Just a hunch, and the media here seems to be thinking along the same lines. On the radio anyway, although some think he will let him go.
if he does, I will at last have the proof. As many have said Burke will be a hypocrite if he lets Penner walk with all he has said/done in the past.
I just believe there is too much pride in Brian to not match. Just a hunch, and the media here seems to be thinking along the same lines. On the radio anyway, although some think he will let him go.
if he does, I will at last have the proof. As many have said Burke will be a hypocrite if he lets Penner walk with all he has said/done in the past.
- Devils88
- Second Line
- Posts: 618
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 6:35 pm
- Custom Rank: Resident Cardsmith
- Favourite Team: New Jersey Devils
- Location: Austria
- Devils88
- Second Line
- Posts: 618
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 6:35 pm
- Custom Rank: Resident Cardsmith
- Favourite Team: New Jersey Devils
- Location: Austria
What are you thinking about this Bonus Clause Theater.
Last Year as i heard from that, i couldn't believe it. First the Owners make a Salary Cap and then undermine it with the Bonus Clauses. i.e Teemu Selanne 2,5 mio. + 2 mio if Ducks reach Playoff, Dominik Hasek also has a Playoff Bonus Clause that pays him nearly 2 mio. this year again.
I find this behaviour extremly unfair. hey, i sign a player for 1$ (that counts against the cap) and pay him 3.999999 mio $ as bonus if he plays one Game. You think this cannot happen??? WRONG. not this drastical but
Rangers pay Shanahan 2,5mio and another 2 mio. if he plays 10 nhl games. they would have had a hard time to resign lundqvist if shanny would be paid 4,5 against the cap (how it should be).
The NHL is darn stupid to allow this.
some will say that this are "brilliant moves" but i call them illegal.....but who cares what the fans think..
Last Year as i heard from that, i couldn't believe it. First the Owners make a Salary Cap and then undermine it with the Bonus Clauses. i.e Teemu Selanne 2,5 mio. + 2 mio if Ducks reach Playoff, Dominik Hasek also has a Playoff Bonus Clause that pays him nearly 2 mio. this year again.
I find this behaviour extremly unfair. hey, i sign a player for 1$ (that counts against the cap) and pay him 3.999999 mio $ as bonus if he plays one Game. You think this cannot happen??? WRONG. not this drastical but

Rangers pay Shanahan 2,5mio and another 2 mio. if he plays 10 nhl games. they would have had a hard time to resign lundqvist if shanny would be paid 4,5 against the cap (how it should be).
The NHL is darn stupid to allow this.
some will say that this are "brilliant moves" but i call them illegal.....but who cares what the fans think..

- bruins72
- TBL Admin Team
- Posts: 14513
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:13 pm
- Custom Rank: Challenge Guy
- Favourite Team: Boston Bruins
- Location: Taunton, MA
The bonus clauses are only allowed to the older players, if I understand it correctly. I think they did this so that teams wouldn't give huge contracts to older players. Instead they allow them to pay them less but if they reach certain goals, they can earn more. If I remember correctly, it counts against them on the next cap though. I'm not certain though. I'd like somebody to back that up.
- batdad
- The Great One
- Posts: 12616
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:46 pm
- Custom Rank: Mr Technology
- Favourite Team: Syracuse Bulldogs.
- Location: Look behind you, you peon
The bonuses are only for old men, and young kids. I have no real issue with it at all. It makes them play hard, and replaces cash given to them up front. Bonuses are counted in the cap. Full bonuses. Look at Crosby on an entry level deal....his cap hit is 3.75 mill. for every season including rookie year. Cause of the bonuses. Max he could get is what $850 thousand as base pay?
Come on Burkey...match..don't match..just want to hear what you have to say. It will be fun. Come on...
Come on Burkey...match..don't match..just want to hear what you have to say. It will be fun. Come on...