Moderator: Challenge Moderators
Do you manage every game? I ussually spent 8 hours for just one recording segment (20-30 games)Salming wrote:Oh to answer the question. It take me like 8-10 hours to make a full seson in this challange. most time take draft and the damm trade couse we are only allowed to make one so i check all teams several time to get best poosible trade i like.
darn, I'm sloooooow.yes challange rules force us to manage all games. altough i mostly do em on very fast or something. only reduce speed when i got trouble. When i play flames i just close my eyes and press space 3 times haha. they are strong as hell in my gameMcQwak wrote:Do you manage every game? I ussually spent 8 hours for just one recording segment (20-30 games)Salming wrote:Oh to answer the question. It take me like 8-10 hours to make a full seson in this challange. most time take draft and the damm trade couse we are only allowed to make one so i check all teams several time to get best poosible trade i like.
That's ONLY 22 goals. Trust me, it's not that bad. I was forced to play Dubnyk as a starter for over half of the season. It can be worse.Lazion wrote:Stone has played well, point per game so far in second line.. in fact he is best scorer in 2nd line.
Instead of Stone I toss Cogliano and Gagner to AHL and try Comrie or Hemsky in first line.. I still need good 2-way player to put peaces together. Sad thing is that there's no such one available. Reddox seems to be suitable to 3rd line.. just to need wait Pisani get healthy. Meanwhile Pouliot can play in 3rd line.
Oh man JDD is injured.. Dubnyk allowed last three games amazing 22 goals.
If you were able to make a waiver claim when Thomas became available, would you have claimed him? Of course you would have!batdad wrote:Wow. BRuins try to trade Thomas, noone bites. Bruins waive Thomas--no one bites. Now it is January 1st and guess who the Bruins put on the block?
Nope....Not Thomas. Rask.
richards. u need a center big timevisualdarkness wrote:http://img714.imageshack.us/g/screenshot114.gif/
Which one should i make? I got a several other choices to, but I think these are the best ones. Gagner isn't really in my plans anyway due to his incompatibility with my style of tactics, so I can trade him without any problem.
The Kesler deal brings me a bonus in Raymond who would get a role on my checking line. This deal will stack my team a bit too much, but a plan to open some spots next season.
Richards is exactly the player type I want (well, not his size but you can't get everything). I'm not too fond of letting Pisani go as it will lead to me being almost unable to put up a real checking-line, but it also opens up for a younger player take his place soon.
I'd go for Richards too. He's awesome. You get a top line player and a captain.visualdarkness wrote:http://img714.imageshack.us/g/screenshot114.gif/
Which one should i make? I got a several other choices to, but I think these are the best ones. Gagner isn't really in my plans anyway due to his incompatibility with my style of tactics, so I can trade him without any problem.
The Kesler deal brings me a bonus in Raymond who would get a role on my checking line. This deal will stack my team a bit too much, but a plan to open some spots next season.
Richards is exactly the player type I want (well, not his size but you can't get everything). I'm not too fond of letting Pisani go as it will lead to me being almost unable to put up a real checking-line, but it also opens up for a younger player take his place soon.
The problem is, what to do with Horcoff? He has been a great player with good chemistry with Penner and Moreau. I will have to decide if I should switch the place of the lines or maybe keep them as they are with the exception that Richards is centering Mikhnov and Hemsky instead of Comrie.bruins72 wrote:I'd go for Richards too. He's awesome. You get a top line player and a captain.visualdarkness wrote:http://img714.imageshack.us/g/screenshot114.gif/
Which one should i make? I got a several other choices to, but I think these are the best ones. Gagner isn't really in my plans anyway due to his incompatibility with my style of tactics, so I can trade him without any problem.
The Kesler deal brings me a bonus in Raymond who would get a role on my checking line. This deal will stack my team a bit too much, but a plan to open some spots next season.
Richards is exactly the player type I want (well, not his size but you can't get everything). I'm not too fond of letting Pisani go as it will lead to me being almost unable to put up a real checking-line, but it also opens up for a younger player take his place soon.
You could keep Horcoff as your top line center, put Richards as your second and then Richards could also play on the PK (in addition to PP), maybe? Or if you wanted to juggle your lines some, you could put Horcoff on the LW with Richards at C and Penner at RW.visualdarkness wrote:The problem is, what to do with Horcoff? He has been a great player with good chemistry with Penner and Moreau. I will have to decide if I should switch the place of the lines or maybe keep them as they are with the exception that Richards is centering Mikhnov and Hemsky instead of Comrie.bruins72 wrote: I'd go for Richards too. He's awesome. You get a top line player and a captain.
Horcoff isn't perform nearly as good on the LW, so I don't want to do that. I'll put Richards in Comrie's (who isn't performing too well) plays and see how that works out. My third line will be a bit too offensive and soft though...bruins72 wrote:You could keep Horcoff as your top line center, put Richards as your second and then Richards could also play on the PK (in addition to PP), maybe? Or if you wanted to juggle your lines some, you could put Horcoff on the LW with Richards at C and Penner at RW.visualdarkness wrote:The problem is, what to do with Horcoff? He has been a great player with good chemistry with Penner and Moreau. I will have to decide if I should switch the place of the lines or maybe keep them as they are with the exception that Richards is centering Mikhnov and Hemsky instead of Comrie.bruins72 wrote: I'd go for Richards too. He's awesome. You get a top line player and a captain.
If that makes your 3rd line too soft, you could always go with Richards centering the 3rd line, one of the PP lines, and the PK. If he's playing 3rd line on even strength, he'll have plenty of energy for the special team lines. It might be under-utilizing him though. Who are the wings on the 3rd line?visualdarkness wrote: Horcoff isn't perform nearly as good on the LW, so I don't want to do that. I'll put Richards in Comrie's (who isn't performing too well) plays and see how that works out. My third line will be a bit too offensive and soft though...
