Analysis of Red Wings, Canucks, Oilers, Minnesota, Colorado

[hasp]

Red Wings:

Def=*****
3 players of first line level
1 players of second line level
3 players of third line level

For-*****
5 players of first line level
3 players of second line level
4 players of third line level
0 players of fourth line level

Goalies-***

First line very good and very good tactick. They have only high def and off skills.
Dump system and high forechek work very good for def and off sytuation.
other lines have their hero and anti-heroes.
with the exception of defenders. almost all except for 1-2 players at very high level.
goalkeepers leave much to be desired.

Canucks:
Def=*****
2 players of first line level
3 players of second line level
1 players of third line level

For-*****
5 players of first line level
2 players of second line level
2 players of third line level
3 players of fourth line level

Goalies-***

Good first and second lines with atacking high forechek style hard pressing and backchecking. 3-4 lines not so well perform tasks.
in all lines are very good defenders. not very good Goalies.

Edmontom Oilers:

Def=****
2 players of first line level
2 players of second line level
2 players of third line level

For-****
5 players of first line level
1 players of second line level
2 players of third line level
4 players of fourth line level

Goalies-****

in team very good working only first and second lines with atacing skating, crash the net and neutral zone trap tacktik.
you can feel the lack of in depth players. in a team good defenders and goalkeepers.

Colorado Avalanch:

Def=***
1 players of first line level
2 players of second line level
3 players of third line level

For-**
0 players of first line level
5 players of second line level
3 players of third line level
4 players of fourth line level

Goalies-***

the team have high level players, but they have no performance. moreover, they continue to play in their positions as well.
tactics 1-2 lines are identical and 3-4 too, and differ only in the mentality.
among the defenders evident hole and I don't see injured defenders of the high-level team.
among the attackers see a small lack of mobility, but mobility level all the players ' attacks was approximately the same.
in depth all is not very good and with goalkeepers too.
the team certainly has great potential, but until the key players not begin to manifest themselves command is doomed

Minnesota wild:

Def=****
2 players of first line level
3 players of second line level
1 players of third line level

For-***
2 players of first line level
2 players of second line level
3 players of third line level
5 players of fouth line level

Goalies-****

not enough players of equal level and ability. many players lack of mobility. not enough confident depth of players.
all of this is fueled by the fact that all the lines follow the same attacking. very good only 3 people Ogren, Laforge, Davidson.
the goalkeeper of the team, I would put the estimate of 4.5