RAR vs. ZIP

Want to ask EHM graphics questions, questions about a project or make requests for a project? Don't know what files go where? Are you working on a new addon or roster update? This is the place to discuss!
Forum rules
Data Editing Forum: Editing the game, databases or saved games. Home of the EHM Editor and the EHM Assistant.

Game Add-ons Forum: Database projects, graphics and sounds. Any discussion which does not relate to editing databases or saved games.

Game Knowledge Discussion: Attributes, coaching, drafting, scouting, tactics and training/practice.

Rosters Forum: Discussion relating to all database and roster projects for Eastside Hockey Manager.

TBL Rosters: Discussion, crashes, data issues, questions, etc relating to the TBL Rosters update for Eastside Hockey Manager.

Technical Support: Difficulties, crashes and errors when installing or running the game (and nothing else). Any issues relating to the TBL Rosters must be posted in the TBL Rosters forum. Questions about how to install add-ons must be posted in the Game Add-ons Forum.

General EHM Chat: Anything relating to Eastside Hockey Manager 2004 / 2005 / 2007 / 1 which does not fall within any of the other forums.

Useful Links: Find your EHM 1 installation folder locationConverting an EHM 2007 database into EHM 1Logo sizesWhere to install add-ons
Post Reply
User avatar
ElQuapo
Fringe Player
Posts: 393
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 9:24 am
Location: Denmark

RAR vs. ZIP

Post by ElQuapo »

Just wondering because I have noticed most people use RAR files for their packs.

Is RAR better than ZIP in some way? Does it make files smaller or have better support for different characters or something?

I have no idea what the difference is myself. I have always just used ZIP, as they can be opened directly in Windows XP without the need for a stand alone unpacking program.
User avatar
inSTAALed
Stanley Cup Winner
Posts: 1443
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 10:51 pm
Custom Rank: Back From The Dead
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post by inSTAALed »

RAR is just all around better for basically everything.

It opens most compressed file types including .ZIP files.

It also looks better and is slightly faster in my experience.
User avatar
Minstrel
TBL Admin Team
Posts: 6527
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 11:17 am
Custom Rank: Minty
Favourite Team: Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Post by Minstrel »

.rar files are much more prone to being corrupted on download and is also a less 'accessable' format since many people don't have the tools to extract .rar files. So while .rar might be better slightly better at doing compression it suffers on the ease of use for all users side of things, whihc is why I stick with .zips
User avatar
ElQuapo
Fringe Player
Posts: 393
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 9:24 am
Location: Denmark

Post by ElQuapo »

Minstrel wrote:.rar files are much more prone to being corrupted on download and is also a less 'accessable' format since many people don't have the tools to extract .rar files. So while .rar might be better slightly better at doing compression it suffers on the ease of use for all users side of things, whihc is why I stick with .zips
Yeah, same here.

I have also noticed that a few rars I have downloaded won't open correctly in my program, allthough I don't have WinRAR itself, which might be the problem :dunno:
sachmo
Learning to skate
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 4:51 pm

Post by sachmo »

Minstrel wrote:.rar files are much more prone to being corrupted on download and is also a less 'accessable' format since many people don't have the tools to extract .rar files. So while .rar might be better slightly better at doing compression it suffers on the ease of use for all users side of things, whihc is why I stick with .zips

Download 7-zip. It's freeware (i think), and you will never be caught without a decompression tool again. :)
Post Reply