philou21 wrote:You know that it's better that you write your post UNDER the quote so it's less confusing?
Different.

philou21 wrote:You know that it's better that you write your post UNDER the quote so it's less confusing?
I agree; I know they're young and need the money, but I'd still like to see them do something "special" for FHM 15. I think I've played FHM 2014 for a total of maybe three or four hours. With that kind of play-time, I'm in no hurry to move on and spend more money.philou21 wrote:They should almost put the 15 version as a big patch/update instead of making another game full price especially with the shape the 14 is in.
Ditto... I almost think that is what you WILL get out of FHM 15 at this point, if it is even released before January 1.B. Stinson wrote:I agree; I know they're young and need the money, but I'd still like to see them do something "special" for FHM 15. I think I've played FHM 2014 for a total of maybe three or four hours. With that kind of play-time, I'm in no hurry to move on and spend more money.philou21 wrote:They should almost put the 15 version as a big patch/update instead of making another game full price especially with the shape the 14 is in.
The biggest benefit of the game being greenlit is it can reach a wider audience and perhaps help them bring in more revenue to support future development of the game, maybe hire more coders.SkierP20 wrote:The big announcement was made last night. The game has been Greenlit. That is what we were all waiting for. It explains all the radio/twitch/podcast PR that they have been doing but I fail to see what it does (if anything) to improve the quality of the game...
No doubt, but here we still sit 5 weeks after the last update with broken contract offers. I tend to agree with Archibalduk.. If you think the OOTP audience has been critical, wait until the Steam folks start paying $40 for the game in the state it is currently in. I too hoped that there would be some major fix on the horizon, and not just an announcement that they are bringing in more money for development. There has been barely a post, yet they are on this interview tour to promote the game. Talk to the people who already own the game!!!LAKingsGeek wrote:The biggest benefit of the game being greenlit is it can reach a wider audience and perhaps help them bring in more revenue to support future development of the game, maybe hire more coders.
Steam community is not exactly exceptionally supportive for expensive products that under-perform...to put it mildly.SkierP20 wrote: I tend to agree with Archibalduk.. If you think the OOTP audience has been critical, wait until the Steam folks start paying $40 for the game in the state it is currently in.
Ding ding ding! We have a winner! Pick anything in this general area.. right in here.. anything below the stereo and on this side of the bicentennial glasses. Anything between the ashtrays and the thimbles. Anything in this three inch area that includes the chicklets but not the erasers.coombs14 wrote:Steam community is not exactly exceptionally supportive for expensive products that under-perform...to put it mildly.
I was really surprised to see they did this. This might become a real mess.coombs14 wrote:
Steam community is not exactly exceptionally supportive for expensive products that under-perform...to put it mildly.
Sebastian once said, " People who don't like something tend to be much louder then people who just enjoy (the game)." and I feel like that is the route that they are taking. The people who are complaining are the minority and there is this sea of users who bought the game and are playing it every day.cyclone wrote:I was really surprised to see they did this. This might become a real mess.
The problem is the design team thinks they have made a good game that is a few tweeks from great,
while hockey people see it for what it is- a poor effort.
Now on steam..methinks they will find out the hard way- and that could impact the sales of their football game in a year's time...
This is absolutely true. Not that I condone their behavior, but the Steam Community is not a group you want to disappoint. And it's very easy to do that. Like you say, $40 for FHM in its current state will not go over well.coombs14 wrote:Steam community is not exactly exceptionally supportive for expensive products that under-perform...to put it mildly.SkierP20 wrote: I tend to agree with Archibalduk.. If you think the OOTP audience has been critical, wait until the Steam folks start paying $40 for the game in the state it is currently in.
I think one of the biggest issues with how everything went was there was a lot of activity during the BETA portion of the release. The OOTP team apparently wanted that. They asked us for it. Then, when the game dropped in September it was almost in WORSE shape than the last BETA release.. the shutout bug had never been fixed.. and there was a lot that was reported by the community that never seemed to be adjusted. They asked for our help, we provided it. We continued to provide critiques, and things got slower, and worse with communication. So we invested money in the game, we helped, and then got told by the lead developer of all people "If you don't like the game, leave!" Brilliant.dave1927p wrote:I think my biggest disappointment with the game is the GUI. Navigating feels way too much like a chore. Luckily the devs realize this and are working on updating that first for the new version.
We sort of witnessed how starting a new franchise in this day is so difficult. I think the devs at ootp learned a lot of lessons they will carry over with their football game. I just hope that in the end it doesn't lead to the demise of FHM because lets face it, it's the only shot at a legit contender to any hockey sim.
Expectations were that it would be similar style to ootp just with less features but it was far from that. I have no doubt that given time these guys can do it. The only problem is will they get that chance. I sincerely hope so.
Yes you do!SkierP20 wrote:I know I probably sound like a broken record..